Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+3\s+Mode\s+Beacon\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 3 Mode Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:27:27 +0100
Dear Graham, LF Group, Have been watching your test for an hour or so. At the peaks of the fades, all 3 modes decode quite well:- MSK4: CQ CQ CQ de g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd CQ CQ CQ de g0nbd g0nbd g0nbd qsl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-05/msg00014.html (9,881 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: 3 Mode Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 00:32:46 +0100
Thanks for that Jim, Seems its close between the mfsk and throb systems , I found the throb mode worked best last night may be its down to the noise format , but psk31 appears to of produced the high
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-05/msg00042.html (10,636 bytes)

3. LF: Re: 3 Mode Beacon (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:59:16 +0100
Dear Rik, LF Group, There are a couple of things I have noticed about MFSK4 receiving Graham's beacon, and in a QSO with G0NBD and M0LMH last week: The frequency has to be set accurately; a 3Hz offse
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-05/msg00395.html (11,440 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: 3 Mode Beacon (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:17:59 +0200
Jim, Graham, MFSK4 seems to be good once you have it synchronized, as John (W1TAG) states. But the threshold to synchronize seems to be rather high. Despite the fact that you signal was audible and t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-05/msg00445.html (11,536 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu