Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+137\s+kHz\s+band\s+\-\s+WRC07\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+137\s+kHz\s+band\s+\-\s+WRC07\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1): Author: Joe Craig <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 19:49:39 -0230 (NDT); Hi Steve, John, Group. The LOA in this part of Canada granted 1 W ERP. If it gets reduced to EIRP, I'll have to run the Decca on 2 of its 3 PA's when we get the band! At least we'll be back on 2200m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00167.html (8,588 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:46:34 +0000; There really isn't a need to even specify a power limitation ! If the WRC conferees thought about it for even 1 minute they'd realize that it's self limiting! Not many hams are going to put 300 mete; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00435.html (10,908 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:48:15 -0700; The Canadian proposal was based on 1W EIRP according to Jim, VE3IQ one of major driving forces behind it. i May even have an email around here somewhere explaining the issue from many years back... I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00487.html (10,215 bytes)
4. LF: Re: 137 kHz band - WRC07 (score: 1): Author: "Steve McDonald" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:26:45 -0700; This is unfortunate and I really wonder why they would seek to define it this manner. It seems to me that simple "ERP" is a much more valid term of reference to use for this application. Interesting; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00507.html (9,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]