Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\"Wolf\"\s+BPSK\s+tests\s+anyone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\"Wolf\"\s+BPSK\s+tests\s+anyone\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:36:07 +0000; May I politely remind us all that the agreed band plan is for data to be in the 137.4-137.6 range. Use of slow CW below 136.0 (band plan beacon section) has seemed to have become common for transatl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00218.html (9,527 bytes)
2. LF: Re: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 17:23:28 +0100; From Dave G3YMC James Moritz wrote: The most important thing seems to be which frequency to use; from this end, the obvious choice seems to be either in the 135.9 - 136.0kHz, or 137.4 - 137.6kHz rang; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-03/msg00224.html (9,756 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]