To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone? |
From: | "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:53:41 -0000 |
References: | <5337.200103161327@gemini> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | <[email protected]> |
From Dave G3YMC James Moritz wrote: The most important thing seems to be which frequency to use; from this end, the obvious choice seems to be either in the 135.9 - 136.0kHz, or 137.4 - 137.6kHz ranges May I politely remind us all that the agreed band plan is for data to be in the 137.4-137.6 range. Use of slow CW below 136.0 (band plan beacon section) has seemed to have become common for transatlantic qsos, but there is no reason to continue this practice for local tests. 73s Dave G3YMC [email protected] [email protected] http://www.btinternet.com/~dsergeant |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone?, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Transatlantic QRSS, James Moritz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone?, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone?, Steve Rawlings |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |