Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+slow\s+WSPR\?\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+slow\s+WSPR\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:21:18 +0100; Try the tests using the Path-sim propagation software , that's a good universal test instrument, free to download G.. http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/files/pathsimtech100.pdf Hello Stefan, all, first; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00296.html (14,213 bytes)
2. LF: RE: slow WSPR? (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:09:54 +0000; Hello Stefan, all, first of all: I am certainly not anti-Opera. I have used the mode on 500kHz and for sure it is a useful mode. But out of curiosity I have done the noise test as described before an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00414.html (13,362 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:48:28 +0200; I think it's better to test the real path out there. That's why we built up our equipment, or not? 73, Stefan Am 12.09.2012 16:21, schrieb Graham: Try the tests using the Path-sim propagation softwar; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00633.html (12,293 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:03:15 +0100; Yes that's true , but for HF , then Doppler and delay need to be tested or the mode will not survive transit and 500 has phase distortion in qsb , could be seen using Murrays psk propagation time del; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-09/msg00784.html (13,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]