Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Progress\s+using\s+WOLF\s+on\s+VLF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Progress\s+using\s+WOLF\s+on\s+VLF\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:48:53 +0100; Hi Rik, I simply forgot the PA at my parents QTH and don't want to wait a week. Also it is overkill to use it for the LOPT. I think the LOPT will handle up to 100W RF. So i will build a separate PA (; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00230.html (11,944 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:13:05 +0100; Hi Stefan, about your question: Then i've done several tests using different frequency tolerance values (above: t = 0.3 Hz). After calibrating the soundcard by using the shown offset, the offset was; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00385.html (13,372 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:55 +0100; Hi Stefan, Integrate WOLF in SpecLab - too much overkill. The program (SL) is, imo, already too overloaded with functions as it grew over the years. Maybe, after everything inside SL uses GPS-based t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00426.html (15,541 bytes)
4. LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:33:38 +0100; Hello Stefan, great experiment. Why not using the "big" bridge-PA and keeping bandwidth within reasonable limits by increasing the transition time (t- option) ? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb_l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00457.html (17,886 bytes)
5. Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:54:46 +0100; Hi Wolf, Thank you. And what about WOLF included within SpecLab? This would help a lot, regarding the drift and offset compensation, especially for the receive stations. Do you think it could be impl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00471.html (13,638 bytes)
6. Re: LF: RE: Progress using WOLF on VLF (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:00:45 +0100; Hi Wolf, OK thanks for the answer. Am 03.02.2012 17:45, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: Hi Stefan, Integrate WOLF in SpecLab - too much overkill. The program (SL) is, imo, already too overloaded with functions; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00495.html (12,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]