Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+PA\s+matching\s+oddity\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:07:39 +0100
Andy,Rik, after thinking a while over the transformer of Andy's PA and referring to http://www.g4jnt.com/pamatch.gif I'm sorry to say that I'm still quite (say 99,9%) sure that it is a conventional 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00016.html (18,745 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:15:31 +0000
I don't use a Bird wattmeter.  Don't trust any directional type of meter for proper power measurements.    I have a  1GHz specified 30dB rated 1kW Bird attenuator (calibrated) plus HP 432 power meter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00043.html (26,039 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:43:04 +0000
BINGO -  Tnx Rik, thats it, convincing.  Sorted   So my thing  IS 1:4 turns ratio, (1:16 Z ratio)  just as the calculations said it needed to be, and is indeed, effectively, an auto transformer.  Oth
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00049.html (15,566 bytes)

4. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:29:55 +0100
Uncertainty of a bird wattmeter with a 1kW slug would be around +/-50W, with a 2,5kW element +/-125W. Power master is a bit better with +/- 30W. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message -- From: andy.g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00141.html (24,098 bytes)

5. LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:53:04 +0100
Andy, have a look here : http://www.polyfet.com/HFE0503_Leong.pdf http://www.semelab.com/rf/documents/Push-Pull%20Circuits%20and%20Wideband%20Transformers.pdf 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb_lf_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00192.html (15,207 bytes)

6. LF: Re: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Clemens" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:14:37 +0100
I've no practical experience with Mosfet PAs. Nonetheless according to your diagram this is definitely a 1:3 transformer. Ther's no way how an autotransformer mode could come into play somehow. scree
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00345.html (15,490 bytes)

7. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:16:19 +0100
Oh yes,be careful about this precious piece of measuring equipment. But then,with < +/- 0,2dB you come out at an uncertainty within of around +/- 42W at 900W. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ -- Original Message --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00406.html (28,505 bytes)

8. Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:48:42 +0000
A follow up to this sage     After much puzzling over the design, and comment here about how it must be 3:1 teh only solution was to measure it.  So I connected up and measured voltages. Indeed, it d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00504.html (22,599 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu