To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:43:04 +0000 |
Cc: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yV3bpvtjTcgRDiLX8NZ9Xdl54TTC1Z2laN5VOJ4FpAY=; b=OPk/kNB/gSU2q+ZQBuVa+mm4eOxosGtLYsErXEfOxawyAh3Xctl95Wd6DVBMGjFXmV xwr7p+lWAy0lmt7VF7UFyWkP1kx8df11mfrr5f9YuCUh0uLdD7nGFEAqalDDc8bYk07G 0PUNWGIQEJ3X8XKWQb1HsxXzUTL3pmw2O2gQI= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VmUvaoF7KCsogk3ssZSf/n1rXxaFkDzHWXZjtLlf/TJUls09YcLagEF3ZY0Lb+pbFx 4kSaQFuFP7HYpPF81EjmeYh7t29ZCX22MJzbAfhn5ptGRh/EexRwBWFszoZVPNScLQsz Pd4a/uUVO5+cY0uakYoLQam0KGY6fPOBbU5B0= |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C1284D4B33E@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <[email protected]> <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C1284D4B33E@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
BINGO - Tnx Rik, thats it, convincing. Sorted
So my thing IS 1:4 turns ratio, (1:16 Z ratio) just as the calculations said it needed to be, and is indeed, effectively, an auto transformer. Otherwise known as a bootstrapped coaxial transformer, but just configured with different reference points to confuse everyone. Your second reference, the Semelab paper, (UKuW see below) gives the answer.
Look at page 10, the 1:9 Ruthroff UnUn . With just two bits of coax, which are then bootstrapped up on top of the input to give a 3:1 ratio (for 1:9 impedance). Add another turn, so three windings are bootstrapped on top of the primary, rearrange the grounding points and there, in all its glory, is my mystery.
The reference / grounding points can be shifted as the mosfet PA has two separate, non magnetically linked cores. This is is just normal push-pull HF PA practice, and being so normal in its concept, completely hides hides a big real advantage - it enables the designer to float just whatever ternainals need to be floated for balanced / unbalanced operation, and even to provide DC isolation, Any conductor passing through the core allows one end to be completely Rf decoupled from the other end, so that's how balanced operation is permitted with the basic Ruthrof design shown in the paper.
On the same page, a single length of coax is shown giving 1:2 transformation by the same bootstrapping arrangement, and when the transmision line is shown as a twisted pair rather than coax, then wrapped on a torroid, it becomes the 1:4 balun beloved of HF antenna constructors. A natural progression that helps illustrate the concept of a loop of coax giving one turn more than it appears to.
It all falls out.
... life is worth living again ...
... can retire happy ...
... now, next job, how to sort out the world financial crisis ...
On 9 February 2010 19:53, Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> wrote:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: XDV on 136.319, Mike Dennison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: swl 136, rn3agc |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: PA matching oddity, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: PA matching oddity, Clemens Paul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |