Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+QRSS60\s+tests\s+on\s+136\.173kHz\s*$/: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

1. LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 17:47:14 +0100
The weather looks to be calm and dry for a few days so from tonight I will be transmitting during the evenings and overnight for about a week. Mode: QRSS60 Frequency: 136.1731kHz Message: "G3XDV" Tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00253.html (9,110 bytes)

2. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: dj2fs <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:26:42 +0100
Hi Mike, I tried to receive your transmission today 05:00 UTC near Berlin in JO62WX Antenna is a just built 6m x 4m loop with Wellbrook ALA100LN-1 preamp. Unfortunately there is much QRM from DCF39 i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00262.html (11,150 bytes)

3. RE: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: Michael Dennison <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:40:24 +0000
From: dj2fs Sent: 28/11/2016 07:28 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz Hi Mike, I tried to receive your transmission today 05:00 UTC near Berlin in JO62WX Ant
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00263.html (11,738 bytes)

4. RE: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: Michael Dennison <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:42:26 +0000
Thanks for trying Jeurgen. I hope you have some success later this week. 73 de Mike From: dj2fs Sent: 28/11/2016 07:28 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz Hi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00264.html (11,939 bytes)

5. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: LineOne <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:56:01 +0000
I'll try to persuade Spectrum Lab to record on the odd hour, it sometimes seem to have a life of it's own. Your signals should show up well. 73, Hugh, M0DSZ Mode: QRSS60 Frequency: 136.1731kHz Messag
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00266.html (10,538 bytes)

6. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:28:30 -0500
Mike, There were two periods of visible activity on your frequency last night, but no ID was possible. I might be able to convince myself of a "G" at 0300, but the necessary quantity of alcohol was n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00272.html (10,846 bytes)

7. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:15:14 -0500
Mike Same here ... no joy. Jay W1VD Mike, There were two periods of visible activity on your frequency last night, but no ID was possible. I might be able to convince myself of a "G" at 0300, but the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00273.html (11,861 bytes)

8. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:56:14 +0100
Hi Mike, Got you, as usual with a good SNR despite high QRN levels. 73, Stefan Am 27.11.2016 17:39, schrieb Mike Dennison: The weather looks to be calm and dry for a few days so from tonight I will b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00274.html (10,868 bytes)

9. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:03:32 +0100
John and Jay, Many thanks for watching. I should be running overnight tests until at least Sunday, so there may be a chance of better conditions. 73 de Mike, G3XDV ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00278.html (11,951 bytes)

10. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:50:04 +0000
Hi Mike - once we get this coronal hole chatter out of the way things over the pole should improve. I don't see any or very little over the pole HF paths either at the moment and "normally" we see th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00280.html (17,966 bytes)

11. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:14:28 +0100
Hi Laurence, Am 28.11.2016 19:50, schrieb Laurence KL7 L: New house next door so Ive gained more SMPSU noise on 137   I need to move... Laurence KL7L What about a remote system? :-) I can tell you it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00281.html (11,596 bytes)

12. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: dj2fs <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:35:22 +0100
Hi Mike 19:00 UTC the signal is very clear near Berlin (JO62WX) : 73, Juergen DJ2FS Am 28.11.2016 um 11:42 schrieb Michael Dennison: Thanks for trying Jeurgen. I hope you have some success later this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00283.html (13,656 bytes)

13. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:20:29 -0500
Mike, Nothing last night, except for some weak traces after 0700. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00290.html (9,989 bytes)

14. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:53:53 +0100
Thanks, John. It is fascinating how easy it is to make a one-hop sky-wave transmission on the 136kHz band (say up to 2500km), even in poor conditions, but how difficult it is to make the next one. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00291.html (10,631 bytes)

15. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:00:06 +0100
I look forward to better conditions, Laurence. Two nights ago your grabber showed very little from DCF39, much worse than last week! Last night the screen was blank - was a receiver connected? It wil
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00292.html (14,846 bytes)

16. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:27:14 +0100
You are not running enough power Mike the leaf should have burst into flames Alan G3NYK Thanks, John. It is fascinating how easy it is to make a one-hop sky-wave transmission on the 136kHz band (say
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00294.html (11,514 bytes)

17. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:25:15 +0000
Hi Mike Tuned my grabber trying to see your signal You are normally visible here during your Op32 transmissions Scroll down to third window http://ea5dom.ure.es/grabber/index.html 73 de Luis EA5DOM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00297.html (11,415 bytes)

18. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:54:43 -0500
Mike, Something was visible between 2330 and 0000z, but no ID. Nothing after. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00298.html (10,034 bytes)

19. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:52:37 -0330 (NST)
Hi Mike, Some light smudges around 0330. Keep tyring! 73 Joe VO1NA Mike, Something was visible between 2330 and 0000z, but no ID. Nothing after. John, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-11/msg00299.html (10,164 bytes)

20. Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:56:24 +0100
Thanks, John, Mike ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00001.html (9,815 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu