Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Permissible\s+QSY\s+limits\s+for\s+136\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 02:13:58 +0100
Thank's for the description , Mike , the distributed inductance on the vertical is interesting , I use a top loading coil with the inv L on 500 ... I did have 2 parallel top wires in rectangular loop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00073.html (12,092 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:17:45 +0100
Hi Mike, Am 04.03.2012 10:56, schrieb Mike Dennison: [...] The original question referred to SWR, which in most cases is irrelevant. In practice, my PA makes worrying noises when the antenna detunes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00101.html (10,247 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:58:13 +0100
My very rough tests here suggest that a Q of 50 is about right. My current reduces to approx 70% at 1.5kHz off the antenna's tuned frequency. This is a Q of 1.5*2/137 = 46%. It is raining at the mome
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00328.html (10,228 bytes)

4. LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:02:43 +0100
Permissible QSY limits for 136 Q what is the average Q of a 136 Khz Ae system ? (back garden + larger) Q What would the maximum acceptable change in frequency +/- Fo before swr considerations became
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00350.html (9,486 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:02:18 +0100
Thanks all for info 73-G. From: [email protected] Graham Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 1:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 Permissible QSY limits
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00442.html (10,562 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:09:15 +0100
Am 04.03.2012 02:01, schrieb Graham: Permissible QSY limits for 136 Q what is the average Q of a 136 Khz Ae system ? (back garden + larger) Maybe arround 50. Q What would the maximum acceptable chang
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00589.html (10,280 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:34:00 +0100
Am 04.03.2012 02:23, schrieb Graham: Thanks' Stefan, . bit late in the night 50 ? That's quite low , I was expecting much higher ? that's for a 'large' system ? Well if you assume a loss resistance o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00637.html (13,044 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:12:11 +0100
Gaham, expecting much higher ? that's for a 'large' system ? do you have a >ball park figure for the max frequency change on that ? For a SWR BW of 1.5 RFsim says around 1.1kHz,that's to say +/- 550H
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00638.html (10,887 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Permissible QSY limits for 136 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:24:19 +0100
Thanks' Stefan, . bit late in the night 50 ? That's quite low , I was expecting much higher ? that's for a 'large' system ? do you have a ball park figure for the max frequency change on that ? 1:1.5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00676.html (11,467 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu