Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+OL9TIT\s+on\s+WSPR\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+OL9TIT\s+on\s+WSPR\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: OL9TIT on WSPR?? (score: 1): Author: LineOne <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:10:34 +0000; Glancing back at the WSPR reception report list at 1434 today I noted one from OL9TIT on 137.404 kHz at -32dB s/n. Thinking this was some sort of Titanic beacon from the Czech Republic and that was a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-12/msg00495.html (8,498 bytes)
2. Re: LF: OL9TIT on WSPR?? (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 21:18:07 +0000; This is a well known phenomena - surely you've seen it discussed on the LF groups over the years. All efficient communications schemes first of all remove all redundancy from a message, before adding; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-12/msg00496.html (12,272 bytes)
3. Re: LF: OL9TIT on WSPR?? (score: 1): Author: LineOne <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:59:02 +0000; Thanks Andy, I've saved the PDF file, I don't use Yahoo so don't see all postings and certainly didn't spot the 0 rather than O on a 12" monitor. On 30/12/2015 21:18, Andy Talbot wrote: This is a wel; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-12/msg00499.html (13,159 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]