Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+New\s+MF\s+Freqs\s+allocated\s+in\s+the\s+U\.S\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+New\s+MF\s+Freqs\s+allocated\s+in\s+the\s+U\.S\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: New MF Freqs allocated in the U.S. (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: 26 Feb 2011 00:09 GMT; Dear all, I guess on these frequencies they should be very careful not to break into the if of many radios receivers! Hopefully most people will listen on FM. HW? 73 DJ1ZB; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00312.html (9,271 bytes)
2. Re: LF: New MF Freqs allocated in the U.S. (score: 1): Author: pa3abk <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:15:19 +0100; This problem is the same as some 30 years ago when maritime coast stations where operating in MF. However considering the 20W ERP assume this will not be a big problem against the 30kW used by coast; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00417.html (10,876 bytes)
3. LF: New MF Freqs allocated in the U.S. (score: 1): Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:48:26 -0500; The FCC just granted a modification that allows the WD2XSH station to use 461-478 in addition to the existing 495-510kHz slot. Same power and bandwidth restrictions apply (20W ERP, 62 Hz b/w for data; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00715.html (9,637 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]