Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MF\/LF\s+QSO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MF\/LF\s+QSO\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: MF/LF QSO (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:49:03 +0100; Most of the time that I call CQ on MF/LF I get a reply, especially when using QSX and specified HF frequencies. Other times I get reports via private emails. I have never found it necessary to use th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00040.html (8,381 bytes)
2. Re: LF: MF/LF QSO (score: 1): Author: John Pumford-Green <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:18:25 +0100; Then how about you ignore their existence instead of passing comment in public about the failings, as you see it, of the systems concerened? If radio operating is your thing, not computerised "applia; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-09/msg00152.html (8,684 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]