Dear Jim and Group, Report of test on my web pages. Jason is brilliant. 73, Brian I'll try to run the Jason beacon from about 2000utc until 2100 or so on 135.910kHz, and from 2300 until 0100 or later
Jim, I heard your CW ID simultaneously with the Jason signal!? (outside the "yellow lines" of course). Are you using a linear P.A. and add the CW as audio to the Jason soundcard output? ...M0BMU JASO
Hello all, I had solid copy of Jim, M0MBU, Jason V0.92, 135.910 on the spot between 2015Z - 2045Z. Screen capture available on request. My first copy of a Jason signal! I am surprised that my PII-350
Hi Jim, Any reports would be welcome. Part of Jason screen is attached. Displayed time is UTC+1h. Even the CW ID was "armchair copy" (aural) with SSB filter. 73 Johan SM6LKM TIFF image
Dear LF Group, I'll try to run the Jason beacon from about 2000utc until 2100 or so on 135.910kHz, and from 2300 until 0100 or later on 135.990kHz, just for a change and to see if this frequency is a
May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian Dear Brian, So if I transmit a bea
I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz a good frequency, or is there a better one? Jim, I was watching your frequency last night but saw nothing identifiable. I ha
Dear Jim, I can run the beacon again tonight in anyone is interested - is 135.910kHz a good frequency, or is there a better one? May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines
Dear LF Group, Thanks to I2PHD, DJ8WX, NL9222, G3NYK for the reports and images, and to anybody else who was watching for my Jason v0.92 test sigs. I transmitted on 137.510 from about 2030 - 2210, an
