Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Intercontinental\s+LF\s+waterholes\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:24:00 -0500
Markus, My antenna tuning unit is outside 100 meters away from the ham shack. I am unwilling to go out in the winter night to retune the antenna to QSY to the lower frequency segment. -- 73 Warren K2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00207.html (15,039 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:24:31 +0100
Markus is absolutely right. This should reduce QRM for those monitoring for DX, and improve the chance of two-way DX QSOs. However, I think many stations have recently used the upper slot because mos
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00228.html (13,318 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:00:11 +0100
Hello Marcus, if all stations switch at local midnight (UTC of course) this would result that in Europe there will be sub-band switching over a 4 hours period (from UA at the east to G/CT at the west
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00233.html (13,849 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:08:16 +0000
HI Guys I wish this was problem here!!! Here's hoping they give us the band in Canada in the new year. 73 Scott Markus Vester wrote: Dear Warren, LF, well your point about the winter night is perfect
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00321.html (12,638 bytes)

5. LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:14:34 +0100
Dear LF group, recently we find the "transatlantic waterhole" around 137.777 kHz quite busy. Several Europeans have started beaconing within this segment. And there has been some fast (QRSS3 or 10) a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00329.html (12,292 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:47:54 +0100
Hi Warren, I just wished I had that problem!! 73 Victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Namens Warren Ziegler Verzonden:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00386.html (14,115 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:42:22 +0100
Hello LF, Markus , I adère at your request ! if the activity wanted to return on 2200m , perhaps that the weather would be necessary to be simple ! How says it Warren to change frequency during the n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00460.html (11,597 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:49:56 +0100
Sorry typo ! "Be-Asia" = East-Asia Hello LF, Markus , I adère at your request ! if the activity wanted to return on 2200m , perhaps that the weather would be necessary to be simple ! How says it Warr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00471.html (11,672 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: Gerhard Hickl <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:26:51 +0100
Hello folks! I was one of the "bad boys" transmitting yesterday night in the "waterhole"...The purpose were some test with the antenna where I rely on grabbers. But of course, I didn't choose my qrg
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00545.html (15,118 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:56:55 +0100
Dear Warren, LF, well your point about the winter night is perfectly understood... A fixed QRG will not be a problem for transatlantic contacts, as long as we Eu's would transmit in the lower band. O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00585.html (13,386 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:38:18 +0100
Dear LF, the passage should have said: Taking into account the path of mutual darkness, this would mean that all stations should transmit in the UPPER band during their evenings until local midnight,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00590.html (14,798 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: Vernon <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:52:29 +0000
Gerhard please turn off your requested response feature in your email... Many thanks... Vernon -- Original Message -- From: "Gerhard Hickl" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00648.html (15,315 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes (score: 1)
Author: ALAN MELIA <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:27:02 +0000 (GMT)
Hi all, I think Markus idea is a good start but we have always made it the case that we do not have hard and fast rules on LF because the frequency of operation epends so much on local conditions and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00665.html (12,590 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu