Hi Roelof, Very interesting. It also affects VLF! Clearly visible e.g. at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html It happens since about 9 UTC. Would have been interesti
Hi All What we got at about 9 UTC was an intense flare peak reaching R2 http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/space-weather-enthusiasts Looks like since then I’m getting less ground noise in my
Another even stronger one at 12 UT: http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/goes-xray-flux.gif 73, Markus (DF6NM) --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: DK7FC <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb
seems to be a X10 flare, it has been a while that we had such a strong flare 73, Rik ON7YD Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens Markus Vester <markusves
Hi Rik without checking I think you are right the downward slope of the last cycle seems to come to mind. It doesnt look as though the GEOS sensors saturated so the flux value should be about right.
Pesky Protons it hit Alaska almost immediately and one of the few nights with XPQ reporting zero decodes on 137/475 wspr2 laurence G4DMA East Grinstead W Sussex On Sep 6, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Alan Melia
Hi Rik, Yes; impressive. You wrote: ... seems to be a X10 flare, it has been a while that we had such a strong flare ... See: http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/test/show_wf.cgi?date=17-09-06 May be the stro
I get a "forbidden" message and teh screen shown below when trying to view the second URL, the .PNG file Inline images 1 On 6 September 2017 at 18:02, P. W. Schnoor <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Rik, Yes;
Hi Andy, I see. Thanks! My fault due to the paranoid configuration of the web-server. Direct access of ".png" inside that directory from outside is prohibited. Go to: http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/hbg/s