Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+EbNaut\s+2200m\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+EbNaut\s+2200m\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:46:00 -0330 (NST); It seems the gps derived carrier is behaving itself so let's try: 137.477 kHz, 7 Chars, 8K19A, 3 s symbols, 608 symbols, starting 1600 ut and at 1 hr intervals, 50 watts to the momopole. 73 Joe VO1NA; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00424.html (8,524 bytes)
2. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 16:55:21 -0500; Joe Didn't get a chance to check last night but good copy mid day and this afternoon. 12/25/18 VO1NA 137477 8K19A CRC16 3 sec sym 7 char 1600z Rank 0 Eb/Naut 16.4 dB PHOTON 1700z Rank 0 Eb/Naut 15.4; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00444.html (10,631 bytes)
3. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 18:45:20 -0330 (NST); Hi Jay, Pleased to confirm the reception. Garry K3SIW sent an email earlier that alerted me that I hadn't changed the message as intended so I'm grateful to him too. It is amazing what can be done on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00445.html (10,159 bytes)
4. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: "Rob Renoud" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 02:36:28 +0100; Hi Joe, Had a chance to decode several periods this evening. Blockbuster signal if one can believe the reported Eb/N0 out of the decoder for the first two reported periods! 2200Z: Rank 0; Eb/N0 71.8; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00447.html (9,598 bytes)
5. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:59:23 -0330 (NST); Thanks Rob, 72 dB is a bit suspicious isn't it? But 18 db and a rank 0 means you are receiving well I believe. Not bad for 5o watts and a high SWR on this end. Joe Hi Joe, Had a chance to decode seve; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00461.html (9,916 bytes)
6. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 15:11:30 +0000; Indeed, a blockbuster signal - no symbol errors at all! The decoding program makes an estimate of Eb/N0 from the number of symbol errors. This fails, saturating at 71.8dB, when there are no errors. I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00462.html (10,650 bytes)
7. Re: LF: EbNaut 2200m (score: 1): Author: Rob Renoud <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:11:56 -0500; Paul, Thanks for the details regarding the Eb/N0 numbers - I though, perhaps, that the Eb/N0 was a default value it was much higher than SL Spectrum Display appeared to support. The carrier Eb/N0 for; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00465.html (10,818 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]