Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Earth\s+mode\s+ranges\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Earth\s+mode\s+ranges\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Earth mode ranges (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:55:43 +0000; Rick My proposed experiment would be one electrode in the sea and one 100m or so in from the shore on land. I expect good range is achievable along the coast to a similar station using another pair o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00289.html (12,930 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Earth mode ranges (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:17:08 +0100; Something like this was reported some years ago either in RadCom or in the early days of this reflector. I can't remember who, or what band, but I think it was in southwest England. Has anyone got a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00662.html (9,108 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Earth mode ranges (score: 1): Author: Rick Wakatori <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:42:00 +0900; Hi Roger, Try more. The following grabber site has used the two electrodes earth antenna and good receiving QRSS/DFCW at 136kHz. http://www16.ocn.ne.jp/~macoco/grabber.html Depending on the circumsta; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00870.html (10,879 bytes)
4. LF: Earth mode ranges (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 20:12:49 +0000; A further observation from my 8.76kHz earth mode test today: with 17dB above the noise signals at 5.1km using QRSS3 there is plenty of (theoretical) range still to be had with utilities assisted eart; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01072.html (11,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]