Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Digital\s+modes\s+comparison\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:04:38 +0100
He doesn't include WSPR in the list, but I would expect this to be close to JT65 i.e. very good. Is this data from Andy G4JNT's paper? 73s Roger G3XBM On 29 July 2010 21:48, John Bruce McCreath <weaz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00032.html (12,003 bytes)

2. LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:48:55 -0400
Hello LFers, I found this while web browsing....interesting reading and Mal's favourite mode isn't top dog. http://kb2hsh.blogspot.com/2010/05/capabilities-of-weak-signal-digital.html I was looking f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00052.html (9,165 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:56 +0100
Presumably "QRSS very very slow" is better still, but here this issue is the time to get data through. Andy, I assume that you're saying WSPR or JT4A give the best "data per bandwidth per given time"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00121.html (15,331 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:58:51 +0100
73s Roger G3XBM On 30 July 2010 08:17, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: Try WSPR at 6Hz bandwidth  or JT4A at less that 20Hz.   They are both MSFK constant envelope schemes.   Andy www.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00184.html (16,835 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:14:00 +0100
J.. Take a look at ROS MF-7 and MF-1 , last time I checked using a parallel tx on 500 MF-1 was running round 2 dB lower than wspr over a 350 mile path to delft , via the web-sdr The EME mode is also
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00214.html (10,728 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:54:48 +0200
On 7/30/2010 9:17 AM, Andy Talbot wrote: Try WSPR at 6Hz bandwidth or JT4A at less that 20Hz. They are both MSFK constant envelope schemes. Or maybe Jason, with its 6 speeds (Slow, Normal, Fast, each
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00245.html (10,872 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:17:06 +0100
Try WSPR at 6Hz bandwidth  or JT4A at less that 20Hz.   They are both MSFK constant envelope schemes.   Andy www.g4jnt.com 2010/7/29 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> Andy, LF, Which di
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00261.html (14,046 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:02:17 +0200
Andy, LF, Which digital mode could be most suited for a band where one has just an antenna bandwidth of some Hz? You know what i mean... And what could be the "gain" compared to DFCW-600. Gain means
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00279.html (12,419 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:54:09 +0200
Roger, VLF, I will check the resonance curve in the next experiment. Maybe it is higher than expected due to the high R in that RLC-circuit... So maybe there are even some many Hz available... Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00341.html (17,705 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Andy - KU4XR <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
JASON is good choice... Use " Slow " mode, abt 2 Hz BW, drift must be minimal though. Message inserted between < ..... > will transmit in beacon form. I think it takes abt 3 minutes to transmit 1 cha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00351.html (11,542 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:07:16 +0100
It would be very interesting to see those figures normalised to a constant data rate / bandwidth.  For example, PSK31 shown at -10dB is identical to PKK63 at -7dB - well it would be, its the same mod
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00352.html (12,278 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Digital modes comparison (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:35:42 +0200
Am 30.07.2010 10:54, schrieb Alberto di Bene: ...no need for linear amps. 73 Alberto I2PHD This is important, tnx! 73, Stefan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00464.html (10,723 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu