Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Digital modes comparison

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Digital modes comparison
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:17:06 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/ZsxN+IWkkJJoswOYB6lObWrzvDqWtsBR+w7+AO3qJY=; b=gntg9MuUhBvp/n3DlPPwr97ev+SD97CDhsIVzsuR0xJEwvJdauWLvL2FQHYp7/Qy0U 4+hMf+0hQBWL/kZ+8TGkPFu2aLzY21QuXTIT+CEOFq+KWdKkEdZoRaR9caFrwKv9Qrqo /SpTnzZVWIL2Hj/fAY62lSLqS4JtOmtCh7Ea4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Q3c6PEFscyg+dwdgXwpAYR8xm6bBZYPIEUR8Oem4Dd1xfu7C6p8A6TmP7Be4e8ymTs KROYnOdQfIo+YV/paL+qR/8H+jWoork79T9ABfk48DYMAhYvcPv8bxKFg1HK/idY/tOu pL2YikqrfLhwYJuUN6IserGaElVhh+sCZuMsI=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Try WSPR at 6Hz bandwidth  or JT4A at less that 20Hz.   They are both MSFK constant envelope schemes.
 
2010/7/29 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Andy, LF,

Which digital mode could be most suited for a band where one has just an antenna bandwidth of some Hz? You know what i mean... And what could be the "gain" compared to DFCW-600. Gain means here, how far(er) could it be detected, not how much more information can i transmit within the same time.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: I see that e.g. JT65 needs abt 200 Hz, so this NOT suited!


Am 29.07.2010 23:07, schrieb Andy Talbot:
It would be very interesting to see those figures normalised to a constant data rate / bandwidth.  For example, PSK31 shown at -10dB is identical to PKK63 at -7dB - well it would be, its the same modulation, just faster.   Ie plot Bits/second/Hz vs. Eb/No, then stick the Shannon limit on the graph and see which lie nearest.
 
The fact that JT65 is at the top is probably because it sits at around 0.27 chars / second, or something like 1.2 B/s.  Although even after normalisation, it would no doubt still score well up.
 
On 29 July 2010 21:48, John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello LFers,

I found this while web browsing....interesting reading and Mal's favourite mode isn't top dog.

http://kb2hsh.blogspot.com/2010/05/capabilities-of-weak-signal-digital.html

I was looking for sites having info about digital modes on 1,800 kHz. and lower frequencies.

73, J.B., VE3EAR

LowFER Beacon "EAR"
188.830 kHz. QRSS30
EN93dr








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>