Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Digital modes comparison

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Digital modes comparison
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:56 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vYuvGFJUzrmhpmBXLIf0Jdwe7ZwLKi5pB2Jjng+4J94=; b=oyCrpR0CyrX97T1JHU/6EqwM4GgHitdP1KhSTnY0fkoJ9DKVFs254b3UriZov8BCDa 6TQmGOvQQPY2R8XZSZONQORd6xaXnUnCCUbVo5lkRuAgzyeuWLbYtZzthEBmM2CoMn2Z ArhMpdvXsX/NTX882fGhbODrFA4KKJTZ9tcHM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T9pYAZDCHHXR5OekyqaEosU5XS+jJecPF3EmKL0COpR5lBInsMjtx8Do2SHV7NGZ0i gP3w+3z2mz73uoUVzZx2HoyUbfDYNw28RLDeUT+kxrIPRKAOaSOY7vVrRm1e/XuJJ6EM SNo3l3f3S5p/Yiar8nl+ng+6xd3+k6wzoBLG8=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Presumably "QRSS very very slow" is better still, but here this issue is the time to get data through. Andy, I assume that you're saying WSPR or JT4A give the best "data per bandwidth per given time"?

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 30 July 2010 08:17, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
Try WSPR at 6Hz bandwidth  or JT4A at less that 20Hz.   They are both MSFK constant envelope schemes.
 
2010/7/29 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>

Andy, LF,

Which digital mode could be most suited for a band where one has just an antenna bandwidth of some Hz? You know what i mean... And what could be the "gain" compared to DFCW-600. Gain means here, how far(er) could it be detected, not how much more information can i transmit within the same time.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: I see that e.g. JT65 needs abt 200 Hz, so this NOT suited!


Am 29.07.2010 23:07, schrieb Andy Talbot:
It would be very interesting to see those figures normalised to a constant data rate / bandwidth.  For example, PSK31 shown at -10dB is identical to PKK63 at -7dB - well it would be, its the same modulation, just faster.   Ie plot Bits/second/Hz vs. Eb/No, then stick the Shannon limit on the graph and see which lie nearest.
 
The fact that JT65 is at the top is probably because it sits at around 0.27 chars / second, or something like 1.2 B/s.  Although even after normalisation, it would no doubt still score well up.
 
On 29 July 2010 21:48, John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello LFers,

I found this while web browsing....interesting reading and Mal's favourite mode isn't top dog.

http://kb2hsh.blogspot.com/2010/05/capabilities-of-weak-signal-digital.html

I was looking for sites having info about digital modes on 1,800 kHz. and lower frequencies.

73, J.B., VE3EAR

LowFER Beacon "EAR"
188.830 kHz. QRSS30
EN93dr











--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM    GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>