Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+De\s+F6CNI\s+\:\s+Test\s+WSQ\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+De\s+F6CNI\s+\:\s+Test\s+WSQ\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: André Guyé <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:59:33 +0100; HI all, I can transmit on WSQ mode now. Is somebody wants to try that ? I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change this QRG... 73 de F6CNI Andy. Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun vir; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00090.html (11,792 bytes)
2. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:48:15 +0100; Hi Steinar and Andre, Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were perfectly readable until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got too strong. For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00429.html (12,827 bytes)
3. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:40:49 +0100; HEAVY QRM on 472.200 LA5VNA S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00430.html (12,103 bytes)
4. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:32:57 +0100; Hi Andy, Just in QSO with Steinar on 477.5 kHz "USB dial" but that frequency is not the optimum yet. More later.. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 13.02.2014 19:59, schrieb André Guyé: HI all, I ca; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00431.html (12,717 bytes)
5. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:34:01 +0100; I have been in qso with Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I will qsy 472.200 but I am probably to weak for you . LA5VNA S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00432.html (11,184 bytes)
6. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:10:08 +0100; Wolf, rather than adding features to the WSQ sourcecode, why not use SpecLab as an audio preprocessor? A couple of nights ago, inserting the noise blanker function seemed to make a big improvement on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00433.html (14,843 bytes)
7. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:50:23 +0100; urgh... this reflector isn't as suitable for 'real time communication' as WSQ :o) I will try 477.3 kHz again, occasionally calling CQ. 73, Wolf . Am 13.02.2014 20:40, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: HEAVY; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00434.html (12,607 bytes)
8. Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:28:54 +0100; Hello Markus, ok, that would be possible, actually I thought about adding the audio-I/O-DLL based interface into WSQ2. Also having the hard-coded 1000 kHz center frequency editable would (alone) brin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-02/msg00435.html (16,036 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]