Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DJ8WX\s+on\s+8970\.022Hz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DJ8WX\s+on\s+8970\.022Hz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: DJ8WX on 8970.022Hz (score: 1): Author: Gerhard Hickl <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 21:58:15 +0200; Stefan, VLF! In general, I noticed decreasing conditions on VLF during the past weeks. This has on one hand to do with increasing noise and longer noise periods but this alone can not explain the bad; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-05/msg00066.html (11,164 bytes)
2. LF: DJ8WX on 8970.022Hz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 21:04:47 +0200; Uwe, VLF, Today you are visible in 60000 and traces in 6000 but the QRN decreases the SNR significantly (i didn't change the brightness slider since the winther time!). 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.05.2011; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-05/msg00224.html (10,468 bytes)
3. Re: LF: DJ8WX on 8970.022Hz (score: 1): Author: qrss <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 23:10:57 +0100; Uwe Stefan Gerhard LF Uwe's your signal was not quite strong enough for any identification here today. Stefan, yes I compare the diurnal noise level with other Grabbers often and they are similar. I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-05/msg00566.html (13,192 bytes)
4. Re: LF: DJ8WX on 8970.022Hz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 23:25:19 +0200; Hello Gerhard, I am afraid it is not only due to propagation, as you say. As i saw DJ8WX's signal today and compared it to the old signal levels i got the idea that the trees and gras, which are gree; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-05/msg00617.html (12,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]