Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+OFF\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+OFF\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: DCF39 OFF again (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 00:16:57 +0200; Hi Markus, But just 10.9 uV/m ?? They must have quite a high Q on that antenna ;-) Maybe a lightning strike? Probably i'm thinking to analog... 73, Stefan Am 02.05.2012 23:58, schrieb Markus Vester:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00090.html (10,983 bytes)
2. Re: LF: DCF39 OFF again (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 17:58:52 -0400 (EDT); They must have had some problems with the Burg transmitter running wild. Your screenshot shows a pair of unstable lines drifting down to 138.4 and 137.6 kHz. The very same lines appeared here, quite; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00184.html (10,267 bytes)
3. LF: DCF39 OFF again (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:38:02 +0200; DCF39 was offline again this morning between 10 and 11 UTC. To the same time HGA22 had much more traffic. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DCFHGA.jpg Maybe they plan to let HGA22 do the job of bot; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00242.html (8,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]