Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:13:55 +0100
K6STI experimented with automated contesting back then, so did S56A. There is currently a heated discussion going on the [email protected] mailing list about CW Skimmer, its possible impact o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00015.html (11,087 bytes)

2. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:02:51 EST
Hi John, Yes I did varnish them because that was what the rather ancient "Boy's Book Of something or other....." instructed ! A lot of experiments seemed to involve shellac which, at that age, I thou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00033.html (9,625 bytes)

3. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:02:26 +0100
This software is reviewed in the March RadCom which posted to members today. Mike, G3XDV ==
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00034.html (10,283 bytes)

4. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dove <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:55:58 +0000
Hi John, Something like this has already been done, about 20 or so years ago. The creator's call escapes me for now, but he's a well-known West Coast contester: It was a Z-80 (I think) based micro wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00037.html (11,760 bytes)

5. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:23:03 EST
Actualy I do not agree with that statement. It is only in the present state of the art that you might say that a machine cannot read poorly sent morse. It is not so many years ago that the present st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00100.html (10,508 bytes)

6. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:05:42 +0000
Just tune to 14.070 PSK31 for proof...
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00103.html (10,345 bytes)

7. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:41:43 +0100
-- Original Message -- From: "Jan Verduyn" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer It is virtually impossible f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00143.html (13,430 bytes)

8. LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:54:51 +0100
Not sure if this has been mentioned on this group but an interesting piece of software by Alex, VE3NEA, called CW Skimmer has recently been made available, see http://www.dxatlas.com/CwSkimmer/ Altho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00146.html (9,558 bytes)

9. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:45:52 +0100
Hello Pat, LFers, Well said. As a young lad I recall making my first "rig" from a Ford spark coil and sending CW to my neighbour next door. Hardly DX, but I felt a mile high! On the other side of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00170.html (9,714 bytes)

10. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:08:13 +0100
John, Well yes its a shame I like psk, its very good mode , but the number of key tap qso's opposed to mouse click's ones are very few ! , but then agen did cw every really get past the same hi good-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00195.html (11,300 bytes)

11. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:18:50 +0100
If you were doing machine based CW recognition for serious, you would start by collecting data on how people mangle code. This is similar, though with a much more limited language, to the data collec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00211.html (10,941 bytes)

12. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:21:51 EST
Hey! Hey! Listen up guys! When I started this string my intention was not to be disparaging about my fellow amateurs. My purpose was (perhaps with a little tongue in cheek) to stir up a discussion. M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00222.html (13,068 bytes)

13. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:21:01 +0100
Hi Mal, LFers, Not at all. Actually, I've done very little operating with any mode over the years of being a ham. I'm not one for conversation, but I do enjoy building and experimenting with antennas
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00223.html (9,844 bytes)

14. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:08:25 +0100
Take the letter Z for instance sent badly spaced. It could be TD, MI, GE, TTEE. A proficient cw operator would be able to identify the context in which it was being sent and read it accordingly. Pres
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00239.html (12,987 bytes)

15. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:44:47 +0100
It would certainly have made a QSO with 'TI9DX' this morning who was jamming the VP6DX Dxpedition on 7002 and not complained (the chap was heard to accidentally send UA3... once before realising he w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00244.html (10,855 bytes)

16. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:41:45 +0100
No CW since 1974. How can you live without it !!!!! you must miss it !! 14/02/2008 18:35
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00247.html (10,424 bytes)

17. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:17:21 +0100
..... That sounds like someones test for 'AI' .... with a addition of a 'text engine' to sort out the questions , names and call's , you'd never know if it was real station station on the other end ,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00251.html (10,647 bytes)

18. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:40:27 +0100
This gives me an idea. If you combine this program with something to choose which station you wish to work, then link this into your transmitter and leave the whole thing running overnight, you can c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00253.html (9,683 bytes)

19. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Roman ." <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:34:28 +0300
That systems are working with 'ideal' quality CW signal only. The other famous shareware program CW skimmer in russia is UA9OSV CwGet: http://www.dxsoft.com/ru/products/cwget/ * John W Gould <jwgould
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00289.html (11,706 bytes)

20. Re: LF: CW Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Dick Rollema <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:55:47 +0100
Really fascinating! Tried it at daytime on 30m. 73, Dick, PA0SE Although the software costs $75 one can download a trial version (30 days). It's interesting to see that whilst away from the shack thi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-02/msg00293.html (10,166 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu