Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Article\s+on\s+forward\s+error\s+correction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Article\s+on\s+forward\s+error\s+correction\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 07:35:30 +0000; I wrote a non-mathematical introductory article about how forward error correction works. There's a lot of material on the web about FEC but most of it is very technical and tends to concentrate on o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00323.html (10,699 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:18:11 +0000; Absolutely brilliant. The best overall description of FEC I've ever read. Andy G4JNT On 26 December 2016 at 07:35, Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote: I wrote a non-mathematical introductory; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00325.html (11,990 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Bill de Carle <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:02:47 -0500; There should be a "Nicholson limit" for how well something of a certain complexity can be explained using a given number of words with a high probability of being understood correctly. Your paper is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00330.html (11,501 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:17:39 +0000; Thanks Paul. I have added a link on my blog at http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.co.uk . It gets LOTS of visits each day from people all over the world. I have also added a link on my sub-9kHz amateur rad; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00332.html (13,723 bytes)
5. RE: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 18:32:37 -0500; That's a keeper Bill. - Jim AA5BW There should be a "Nicholson limit" for how well something of a certain complexity can be explained using a given number of words with a high probability of being un; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00333.html (13,003 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:44:50 -0500; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00340.html (12,138 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Article on forward error correction (score: 1): Author: Martin Evans <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 16:20:39 +0000; Speaking as someone who hasn't the faintest clue of all this digital stuff, I can't praise Paul's article highly enough - Admittedly I got a bit lost towards the end, but I do now have a rough unders; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-12/msg00341.html (12,598 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]