Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Antennas\/ERP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Antennas\/ERP\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Antennas/ERP (score: 1): Author: "Valerio Gabbani" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:37:09 +0100; ......There comes a point where the voltage on an antenna becomes so high that breakdown occurs. Since for a given antenna, the voltage is directly proportional to the current, this places an upper; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00080.html (8,586 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Antennas/ERP (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:13:32 +0100; A decrease in current from 2.7 to 2.2A would result in FS decreasing by 1.8dB if the antenna remained the same. So overall, there was an improvement of 2.7dB from the radiating point of view, althoug; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00081.html (9,749 bytes)
3. LF: Antennas/ERP (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:32:09 +0000; Dear LF Group, First, the measurements on G3XDV's antenna - The SNR in a 25Hz measuring bandwidth and 9.3km distance was probably about 50dB, so noise was not really an issue. I checked the calibrati; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00083.html (10,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]