Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Acti\s+137\s+kHz\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Acti\s+137\s+kHz\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Albert" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:21:08 +0200; Thanks Stefan, Are you not active in WSPR ? It would be more effective if we all use the same modes. (at least on specific days) I like WSPR because you can clearly and easily see the change of signa; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00114.html (11,846 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:41:29 +0200; Hello Albert, Your WSPR signal in 976 mHz, received in my wideband window at http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_DX_Grabber.html Noisy evening here, many lightnings... 73, Stefan/D; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00224.html (10,632 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:44:34 +0200; Hello Albert, No, sorry, no WSPR here. I am rather fascinated by the traditional modes where the human has to find out a signal from the noise (either by ear or by eye). Am 28.04.2011 00:21, schrieb; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00346.html (13,789 bytes)
4. LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Albert" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:52:53 +0200; All, 2nite WSPR TX on 137.5 kHz (dial 136) tx fraction 30% 73, Albert PA0A; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00375.html (9,398 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: "Albert" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:28:04 +0200; Hello Mal (and others), Back from the hf-bands ? I use WSPR to see if there is any chance (SNR over - 13 dB) for a normal CW QSO. But with most of the stations QRV on 136 kHz nowadays this is not the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00422.html (14,151 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Acti 137 kHz (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:21:35 +0100; Yes if we all use CW, it is more effective and some expertise is required. WSPR is an Appliance Operator mode that does not always decode whereas CW or QRS can easily be read directly by EAR or seen; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00658.html (12,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]