Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AM\s+on\s+472kHz\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:55:02 +0100
Oh my Oh my Well as its past 1600 z , may be its past the op's bed time ? On a serious note , a ssb qso mid day in the barren wastelands north of Watford-gap is one thing , Am is may be a little too
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00121.html (11,579 bytes)

2. LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:19:47 +0100
Making a complete mockery of any attempt to persuade users of different modes to coexist responsibly, an AM QSO is now going on in the middle of the band! I give up! Mike, G3XDV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00202.html (10,124 bytes)

3. RE: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:56:04 +0100
Well written Chris I do think those of us who are all &#8220;hot under the collar&#8221; about things on 472 etc would do well to take a step back, a couple of deep breaths, and remember that it&#821
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00238.html (31,958 bytes)

4. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:45:27 +0000
Pete, Honestly, is this helpful? I have a lot of respect for Mike and others like him, and this sort of attitude is totally uncalled for. 73s Roger G3XBM On 5 January 2013 18:46, M0FMT <[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00288.html (18,250 bytes)

5. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:24:50 +0000 (GMT)
Roger ... Mike es all Sorry..... :o( Regards 73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00294.html (20,338 bytes)

6. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 16:01:32 +0100
Yes JIm, , I seem to of started something here There are speech transmission popping up in the strangest of place's , even on 136 Khz ! I thought from the xdv post there was some form of qrss level s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00425.html (33,565 bytes)

7. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:46:41 +0000 (GMT)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00498.html (17,211 bytes)

8. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 23:37:28 +0000
Forgiven Pete! :-) On 5 Jan 2013, at 21:24, M0FMT <[email protected]> wrote: Roger ... Mike es all Sorry..... :o( Regards 73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00623.html (20,807 bytes)

9. Re: LF: AM on 472kHz (score: 1)
Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 21:55:59 +0000 (GMT)
AM on 472 KHz There has been some emotive discussion about the use of AM on the 472 kHz band. In the first instance I must admit to having used AM on that band for local QSO's and for test transmissi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00652.html (21,537 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu