From HB9ASB, JN36pt Today I've made some comparisons of different Audio-filter settings and CW against Slow CW. All test were made blind and under real band-noise conditions with the main receiving a
Hello Gang, Hi Toni, Today I've made some comparisons of different Audio-filter settings and CW against Slow CW. All test were made blind and under real band-noise conditions with the main receiving
Today I've made some comparisons of different Audio-filter settings and CW against Slow CW. All test were made blind and under real band-noise conditions with the main receiving antenna (low noise,
Hello Gang, For those who are interested in that topic, the MD thesis (Doctoral Dissertation) I have mentioned is: 54°16'N / 10°04'E, JO54ag 73 es gl de Peter, DF3LP
From HB9ASB, JN36pt Here some additional remarks concerning the tests: - The term "blind" means that the Test-TX was sending automatically and I did not know its text in advance. - When testing with
This is most interesting. I note that Toni agrees with Marco's assumption that there is no benefit using longer dots - I presume that the averaging control was altered to the optimum for each of thes
Hello Gang, [...] I agree. The 3 sec time is optimal with white noise QRN or short 'cracks', but many time I would have preferred to have 6 or 10 seconds when receiving with Lux or heavy statics. Agr
From HB9ASB, JN36pt Somehow my last e-mail to this reflector got lost, so here again some explanations: In the meantime I've repeated the tests with two other receivers (Watkins-Johnson WJ8888 and Ic
