Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+74kHz\s+frequency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+74kHz\s+frequency\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 74kHz frequency (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:35:00 +0100; I wonder why the current working frequency of 74,5495kHz was chosen? According to my receive system this is still on the edge of the noise sidebands from DCF77, and some 3dB S/N could be gained by op; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00063.html (8,622 bytes)
2. RE: LF: 74kHz frequency (score: 1): Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:47:06 -0400; Mike-et all; Hartmut and Markus chose the freq. At that time it appeared as good as could be found. If a better one is available to everyone I can move to it without a problem [licensed for 68-76 kHz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00333.html (10,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]