Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+74kHz\s+\-\s+WG2XRS\/5\s+callsign\s+at\s+last\s+\(2of2\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:34:52 +0100
More pics including the XRS/5 caps. The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. If you are using Pegasus Mail, o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00059.html (11,973 bytes)

2. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:36:44 -0400
Mike; Is that "pesky static" a characteristic of this band-from your passed experience? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100 >
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00327.html (12,105 bytes)

3. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:13:23 -0400
Congrats to Mike and Dex on the capture! It's just a matter of sticking it out. I expect things to get even better as temps drop and soil conductivities increase. I would hope the noise drops to some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00328.html (11,560 bytes)

4. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:11:00 +0100
Oh yes. But it is a little early in the year and it will reduce as it does on the other low bands, with some zero static days. When we had the band some years ago, we were mostly using CW and QRSS3 o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00329.html (12,815 bytes)

5. RE: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:40:21 -0400
Mike; Interesting indeed. When you operated here was there a push by the UK ops to move to 137? How did that come about? RSGB influence to move to 137 and just give back 73? > From: mike.dennison@ntl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00330.html (13,697 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:06:22 -0400
Dex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00450.html (11,346 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 74kHz - WG2XRS/5 callsign at last (2of2) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:30:14 +0100
Well, Dex that was the good news. The bad news is that, as I cautioned earlier, the lower noise level lower in the band was a function of my antenna pass band, and not of absolute noise. I retuned to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-10/msg00451.html (11,217 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu