Here are the captures taken last night: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/74550Hz-2013-09-30-QRSS60Screen.JPG https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/74550Hz-2013-09-30-QRSS120Screen.
Hartmut; You make it look easy!!! That station on 74.548 is WG2XRS/5, Dex in South Carolina. I am sure you will see him when condx favor his area. Really great capture-this time I have my transmitter
Hi Bob, LF, last night my improvised grabber http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg indeed showed weak and slightly fuzzy traces on both your QRG's, and on all other integer Hz f
Markus; The artifacts were clear. I agree we need to maybe find a better spot. For tonite though I will be staying close to same freq as last night, for Hartmut no having to retune right now or maybe
All; I plan on 74.549 as Hartmut is setup in that region of the band for tonite. He likes this region of the band and have heard the same from F6CNI [hope I have that correct]. But on the Markus grab
Dex; I moved up a big .2 hz. Hartmut likes the upper part of the band. But hell-there are allot of clear spots around. Where we are ain't bad from what grabbers I have seen namely [Hartmut and Mr Ves
Markus Vester wrote: Attached is a spectrogram which was taken tonight on the resonant antenna. Between statics, you can still see the fourth sideband lobe which is centered near 74.6 kHz. The spectr
Bob Raide wrote: I plan on 74.549 as Hartmut is setup in that region of the band for tonite. He likes this region of the band and have heard the same from F6CNI [hope I have that correct]. But on the
Hi Bob, Markus and all, what about using a frequency around 72.250 in the future? It looks free on the screenshot. 73 Hartmut Am 01.10.2013 08:35, schrieb Markus Vester: Here are clearer shots of the
Here are clearer shots of the DCF77 sidebands from the morning: http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/dcf77_prn_sidebands_131001_0605.png http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/74k_131001_