Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+73\s+KHz\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+73\s+KHz\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 73 KHz? (score: 1): Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:46:20 +0000; Is anyone operating 73 KHz regularly? Is there any slight chance that a ham transmission on this frequency can be heard across the pond? Hi Dexter om. You have pinched my suggestion that I listed a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00131.html (9,240 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 73 KHz? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:56:02 +0100; W4DEX wrote: Is anyone operating 73 KHz regularly? Is there any slight chance that a ham transmission on this frequency can be heard across the pond? If the signal I am seeing on 77.5 KHz is DCF77 it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00166.html (9,382 bytes)
3. LF: 73 KHz? (score: 1): Author: "Dexter McIntyre W4DEX" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:18:49 -0500; Is anyone operating 73 KHz regularly? Is there any slight chance that a ham transmission on this frequency can be heard across the pond? If the signal I am seeing on 77.5 KHz is DCF77 it is Q5 during; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00178.html (7,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]