Eddie, Am 13.03.2013 21:29, schrieb g3zjo: If I am around using GMFSK I will be on 476.100. Getting more people interested so that there is a possibility of random QSO's, err, I will leave that to yo
Stefan, ''not over the long and deep QSB of course''. Unless 'of course' the modes was profiled for MF usage , in which case the interleaving is long enough to ride out the qsb , long interleave and
LF Searching for a Narrow Keyboard QSO mode suitable for QRP on 630m. I went back to a program I used several years ago. Currently Testing GMFSK not to be confused with gMFSK which is a Linux program
Sucess. Just a little more signal and this would have been a really good QSO over our path of 127Km conditions are not good tonight, my antenna current is down. Eddie On 11/03/2013 21:53, g3zjo wrote
Further information :- I am running 15.625Hz Wide GMSK The frequency shift is half the bit rate. Here I include some quotes. Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying, or to give it its full title Gaussian filte
Hi Stefan I am sure Gary is keeping track of the modes he is testing. All I can say is that RTTY, Amtor and most common MFSK modes are too fast for use by lower power stations of for greater distance
Hi Eddie, LF/MF, I'm a bit confused in the last days by the number of various digimodes which have been tested. Gary started with RTTY which is fun and allows real QSOs on 630m, apart from CW. But if
Running GMSK Beacon now on 476.100KHz GMSK Is in MMVari Software. Non decoded reports of my signal welcome. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 14/03/2013 09:50, Stefan Schäfer wrote: Eddie, Am 13.03.2013 21:29,
Its all down to power S .. the bigger the signal (rx end) the faster you can go with the 'very' long qsb , the interleave (FEC) time has to be able to bridge the gap in the signal , so you will alway
