Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+160\s+to\s+190\s+KHz\s+a\s+real\s+magic\s+band\s+\?\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:40:25 -0500
Graham, John and Jay summed it up very nicely. I'd add that my 160-190 kHz license (WE2XEB) is for cw, ssb and digital modes - experimental licenses have no set limits, its all what you can justify a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00082.html (20,738 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:54:02 +0000
Lifted  from the  WSPR  web site  http://wsprnet.org/drupal/ CTRL + Click to follow link http://wsprnet.org/drupal/   1 watt and  15  mtrs  of antenna ,decoding  over  1148 kmtrs  , (best round 2000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00147.html (13,116 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:59:29 +0100
Hi. I also had a message rejected as spam on the 27th. 73s. Ken M0KHW -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Alberto di Bene To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: T
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00189.html (13,328 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:39:41 -0500
Graham, In the U.S., 160-190 kHz is available for unlicensed use with the 1 watt DC + 15 meter antenna as previously mentioned. This has nothing to do with Amateur Radio. There are no assigned call s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00191.html (18,583 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:19:37 +0100
On 12/28/2010 5:22 PM, Graham wrote: Nb looks like someone has the  spam  filter -mal-adjusted- ? It doesn't look as a spam filter... it looks like somebody tried to simulate the behavior of a spam f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00267.html (11,379 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:30:45 +0100
1/4 KW ? Andy is talking about 1 watt dc feed to the PA and a short Ae , I thought 2000 kmt was good going for 1 watt is it the same band ? G.. I occasionally put a beacon on the 180 kHz band with 25
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00318.html (14,472 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:08:15 +0100
Ok Warren Interesting , see who will be the first mille gallon over the pond .. (Imperial gallon of course) G .. Graham, John and Jay summed it up very nicely. I'd add that my 160-190 kHz license (WE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00320.html (18,024 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 02:27:31 +0100
Ken Alberto thinks he knows !!!!!!!!!!1. My server is tight and strips out the text plus I have my own filter. I see references to emails that I do not get. Some attachments also get stripped out. I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00345.html (13,473 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:22:27 -0500
Graham, N.B. the distances quoted (1148km and 2000km) are what you might expect for a station running in beacon mode 24x7 and there is a brief light qrss trace at the very peak of propagation during
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00401.html (12,563 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:34:21 +0100
May be a little Mal-practice a foot ? From: [email protected] Ken Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 8:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00406.html (12,970 bytes)

11. LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:18:24 +0100
Lifted from the WSPR web site http://wsprnet.org/drupal/ 1 watt and 15 mtrs of antenna ,decoding over 1148 kmtrs , (best round 2000k) seems to make the 137 attempts look a little 'coy with somewhat b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00408.html (10,569 bytes)

12. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:08:07 -0500
I occasionally put a beacon on the 180 kHz band with 250 Watts out and have been copied in France and the Netherlands during the time each night that Europe 1 is off. No magic, about the same results
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00468.html (15,535 bytes)

13. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:40:02 +0000
Graham, Have a listen after dark, I seem to remember it was quite horrendous last time I looked at that part of the spectrum. I will have another listen tonight. I think the EU chaps wait until Europ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00655.html (17,954 bytes)

14. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:37:41 +0100
Ok Gary, Seems to be some quite big gaps in that spectrum , big enough for a cw filter and wspr signal to sit with no splash ? G Nb looks like someone has the spam filter -mal-adjusted- ? -- Original
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00752.html (13,658 bytes)

15. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:48:10 -0500
Graham Long distance skywave reception of 1-watt Part 5 stations isn't that unusual during the winter months. While the reception of Andy's WSPR signal at 1200 km looks like somewhat of a feat ... it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00763.html (15,599 bytes)

16. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:24:18 +0100
Dear Graham, LF Group, Andy is talking about 1 watt dc feed to the PA and a short Ae The Part 15 regulations say something like "total length of antenna and earth connection less than 15m", but this
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01037.html (13,202 bytes)

17. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:06:57 +0000
Hi. I also had a message rejected as spam on the 27th. 73s. Ken M0KHW -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Alberto di Bene To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01059.html (14,427 bytes)

18. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:12:11 +0100
Ok Warren Not sure what the land is like in Tennessee , Andy says he was getting reliable wspr decodes over 400/500 miles , but that was from -LF- hams , all the same , with the Ae and power , that's
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01119.html (16,916 bytes)

19. Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ? (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:33:35 -0500
Graham, Yes 2000km is very good for one watt but is not to be expected on a regular basis! I have an experimental license that lets me run 10W ERP on 160-190kHz, my best guess is that with 250W out m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01127.html (18,648 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu