Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?
From:	"Ken" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:58:22 -0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1293569905; bh=n4THKGn6QLNLGn85ujuW5lS6x7PU3315f87NH6bszxk=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=C7/iqGz1Ca0sPquBrcJk6TBZqrMm1ajiR6/c0nx7u6vOqesnlef0MCmk4ke0j60jwYUdpLgfqttq1hlHflwbyTSryaMZ1/mf9YQKeSz78ZRAvjiHan+YBpeq45EM0mkNkZ2jygkSiODhT4HwHhfcGDV/fERGi9vyC27W0EEyeZc=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=mfK4hcSvzRuTNjxwqBk9CzOCLunC7gopNq/VkQsqibNDSkXYRA8/jmwjGeU+BBeN4GpF+jyRWsF+USsj3oDoGgRdT0MGqZ+AsH24LLgvHPNwLlU5pEWaA1nB+x8H4siEwVpQesEVdSlF9LmVbewMKgborLD9mZ44cMlZM8G/PQ4= ;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<F3C727618E8F43C3B0EA41422C3A47AC@AGB> <[email protected]> <101B609FB6D54B6D9FF4102ED3E158BE@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi.

I also had a message rejected as spam on the 27th.

73s.

Ken

M0KHW

----- Original Message -----

From: Alberto di Bene

To: [email protected]

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 6:19 PM

Subject: Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?

On 12/28/2010 5:22 PM, Graham wrote:
Nb looks like someone has the spam filter -mal-adjusted- ?
It doesn't look as a spam filter... it looks like somebody tried to simulate the behavior of a
spam filter, to make you believe that your message was rejected, while it was actually fully read :-) :-)

73 Alberto I2PHD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, (continued) Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Graham Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Graham Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, John Andrews Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, jrusgrove Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Graham Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, James Moritz Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Alberto di Bene Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Ken <= Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Roger Lapthorn Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Graham Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, mal hamilton LF: Re: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, mal hamilton Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Warren Ziegler

Previous by Date:	LF: 136khz tonight, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Roger Lapthorn
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Alberto di Bene
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: 160 to 190 KHz a real magic band ?, Roger Lapthorn
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]