Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+136\s+kHz\s+\-\s+Nostalgia\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+136\s+kHz\s+\-\s+Nostalgia\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 136 kHz - Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: Chris Osborn <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:42:53 +0000 (GMT); LF, I called my head off today on 137 kHz, both on CW and DFCW. Apart from a QSO with good old Jeff, F6BWO there was nothing heard. Looking back in my LF log book for around Easter 2006 there were th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00002.html (9,649 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 136 kHz - Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:57:24 +0100; There are two main reasons for the decline in activity on 136kHz. Firstly, most of those interested in experimenting at low frequencies have migrated to 500kHz. This is exactly what happened to 73kHz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00092.html (10,045 bytes)
3. Re: LF: 136 kHz - Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:50:31 +0100; The migration has never been evident. Where has the 31 countries gone that were active on 137 khz some years ago, certainly not on 500 khz. The utility stations, although not desireable are not a pro; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00188.html (11,275 bytes)
4. RE: LF: 136 kHz - Nostalgia (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:07:31 +0200; GRUMPY OLD MAN Victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Namens mal hamilton Verzonden: maandag 13 april 2009 14:51 Aan: rsg; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-04/msg00286.html (11,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]