Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 562 ]

Total 562 documents matching your query.

201. LF: XES WOLF 137.441 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:08:37 -0400
WD2XES will be running again in WOLF mode tonight, from 2230 until 0200 UTC on 137.441 kHz (note early stop time). John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00246.html (8,271 bytes)

202. LF: WOLF Test? (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:44:19 -0400
I'm back from a business trip -- If anyone would like a WD2XES WOLF test signal tonight, I'd be happy to oblige. If wanted, lower power operation is easy, as the amp has a volume control! Tnx to Hart
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00274.html (7,986 bytes)

203. LF: WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:35:43 -0400
WD2XES will run in WOLF mode tonight on 137.441 kHz. Power will be 6 dB lower than usual, 50 vs. 200 watts. It should be on the air by 2200 UTC. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00275.html (8,874 bytes)

204. Re: LF: WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:01:53 +0100
Wolf, The new version is also running fine here, though local copy is hardly a challenge. I was hoping that you would add the auto re-sync option for the guys who like to sleep at night. Do not apolo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00278.html (9,286 bytes)

205. Re: LF: WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:17:13 +0100
Wolf, Also... the waterfall display is now much cooler. John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00279.html (8,989 bytes)

206. Re: LF: WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:49:17 +0100
Hartmut, That -6 dB didn't hurt too much! I expected some copy, but not that good. Interesting stuff... John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00283.html (9,064 bytes)

207. Re: LF: WOLF Tonight (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:22:47 +0100
Markus, I think WOLF may have some real potential on that long path when the bit rate is slowed down and the sync issue resolved by 1 pps ticks, or whatever. Of course, the throughput will suffer a b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00290.html (9,255 bytes)

208. LF: QRO WOLF (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:40:32 +0100
WD2XES is back on for the night on 137.441 kHz with WOLF at 200 watts output. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES FN42ch WD2XES Status: http://www.w1tag.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00291.html (8,579 bytes)

209. Re: LF: QRO WOLF (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:58:14 +0100
Markus, your "howling" was received and decoded successfully last night for a short period around 03:58 UT:< Congratulations! Looking at the file you sent, I think that the audio level should have be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00297.html (9,432 bytes)

210. Re: LF: Wolf qso (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:57:15 +0100
Markus, et al, Jim's comments are absolutely true, but there is one more grain of information needed for transmitting! You must establish a separate sampling rate on the transmit side. A starting poi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00310.html (9,396 bytes)

211. LF: WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:38:27 +0100
WD2XES is back on 137.441 kHz tonight, with WOLF at 200 watts. John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES FN42ch WD2XES Status: http://www.w1tag.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00311.html (8,988 bytes)

212. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:56:39 -0400
Hartmut, Amazing. Anyone interested in a 15 watt run tonight? That would be 11 dB below normal. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00315.html (9,285 bytes)

213. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:16:24 -0400
Hartmut, I'm interested. The usual frequency? Yes, it seems to be pretty good on both sides. 137.441 kHz, 15 watt WOLF, starting around 2230 UTC. My local sunset is now at 2340 UTC. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00317.html (9,765 bytes)

214. Re: LF: WOLF Again (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:59:04 -0400
Markus, Thanks for trying for the WOLF copy last night. Alan appears to have won the 15 watt prize, unless Hartmut manages to extract something from the noise! Given the vagaries of fading, and the e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00327.html (10,145 bytes)

215. LF: Re: Re: Wolf tests (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:59:47 +0100
Should you have a hankering to try transmitting WOLF on a TA path I can keep an eye open on this side. And my shack needs to be cooled off, too, so I'd be happy to listen for any TA WOLF activity. Jo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00337.html (9,379 bytes)

216. LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:28:15 -0400
Dave, I'm willing to give it a try. What frequency would be good for you? The 137.441 kHz frequency has generally worked well on both sides, though I chose it more for EU than North American reasons.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00339.html (9,445 bytes)

217. LF: Re: TA APR 27/28 (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:52:40 +0100
No WOLF results here either. The noise levels should be better tonight after the departure of yesterday's storm. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00355.html (8,122 bytes)

218. LF: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:05:43 -0400
Upon further reflection, it would make sense to move the EU to NA WOLF transmissions down to the lower end of the band. With NA transmitting activity at the high end, this should help with receiving
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00357.html (8,661 bytes)

219. LF: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:24:42 -0400
Dave, Is there a lower slot? I don't want to annoy all those nocturnal CW operators... Well, we certainly wouldn't want to annoy all of those guys, would we? A quick search doesn't turn up anything i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00360.html (9,198 bytes)

220. LF: Re: RE: Re: RE: Freq for EU-->NA WOLF (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:53:33 -0400
Dave, I'll set it up for 136.082 if the storms have abated your side. It should be a lot quieter tonight in the NE U.S. and eastern Canada. John A.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00363.html (9,086 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu