Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: "Malcolm Harman" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:01:54 +0100
John. Fascinating stuff and all your are papers duly saved. I sort of knew PA0SE must be right and while E/H = 377 ohms between the Helmholtz coils, we have to go to the far field of an antenna befor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00026.html (10,802 bytes)

2. Re: LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: "Malcolm Harman" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:53:11 +0100
John. Scaling your figures to 500kHz that gives a distance of about 820 metres for 1% error, which ties in very nicely with my 955 metres, give or take. Malcolm (G3NZP) Andy, all, Last year, I did a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00076.html (12,126 bytes)

3. Re: LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: "Malcolm Harman" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:56:51 +0100
Hi Andy. Interesting, have a look at http://www.rsgb-spectrumforum.org.uk/radiation_theory.htm where via the 500kHz section (so presumably meant for electrically small antennas) it says "It is genera
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00088.html (13,011 bytes)

4. LF: A question of calibration (score: 1)
Author: "Malcolm Harman" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:17:28 +0100
Hi. Can anyone reassure me. I am in the process of using PA0SE's most helpful article http://www.veron.nl/tech/lf/fsm/pa0se.htm to assist in calibrating my 'Eton E5' as a field strength receiver for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-09/msg00109.html (10,364 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu