Hello Jean and welcome! Many questions but I have time only for a short note. There is not much activity on 160-190kHz in the Pacific Northwest that I am aware of. However you should be able to recei
Joe Thanks for the WH2XIL captures! 73 Warren On Wednesday, January 28, 2015, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Warren, again nice copy of your QRSS60 signal last night. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/h828qio
Roelof, Nice capture of XIL, XES looks good too! 73 Warren On Saturday, March 7, 2015, <[email protected]> wrote: Hello all, Attached an ARGO capture of WH2XIL as received 13 hours earlier tha
Role of, Great capture, thank you! 73 Warren K2ORS/WH2XIL On Sunday, March 8, 2015, <[email protected]> wrote: Hello all, Excellent signals from VO1NA, WD2XES and WH2XIL on 137 kHz between 02:00 an
Hi Markus, I did not run XIL last night except for a brief test, the antenna current was fluctuating which is sometimes an indication of a problem, but may have just been due to the wind. To be safe,
Thanks Joe for another capture-getting warmer here and was 70 F for first time here today in months. 73, Bob WE2xeb WNY From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 21
News from the 600m WD2XSH coordinator that we can expect a FCC NPRM that covers both 137 and 475kHz soon "The FCC has just issued an NPRM proposing secondary amateur allocations at 137 kHz and 472
Just for info to Johan and Stefan : WOW ! Yes I rember the experiments of Dave G3YXM. My first QSO with him on 2 way or x-band 137 CW was 1999/05/15, now 16 years ago ! After I had some others inc
Revisiting the topic... My ERP calculation was erroneous by a factor of ten (looks like I can no longer do without a calculator). It should be radiated power = 0.0256 * 160 = 4 microwatts or -24 dBm
Use, Yes, but its often used with short repeating beacon sequences of a couple of letters so it's not a problem. 73. Warren On Friday, July 31, 2015, wensauer <[email protected]> wrote: How do
You can use a VPN (Virtual Private Network) to mask your IP address. Alternatively, you can use Tor browser, which I tried one time. The problem with Tor is that you can't use any of the many plug-in
Stefan, Thanks for looking! I have been on 137 for 11 years and I have noticed that sometimes only a few tens of km in either transmitting or receiving location makes difference between good copy and
