Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 275 ]

Total 275 documents matching your query.

41. Re: LF: Puckeridge Experiments (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 23:31:18 EDT
<< ERP will be calculated on the basis of estimated radiation resistance and measured antenna current for each antenna. For the inv. L this should be about 20 milliohms and 2A, for the main mast abou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00278.html (12,310 bytes)

42. Re: LF: Re. Decca Mast (G3KEV) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 19:22:53 EDT
<< The Top load does not produce horiz.polarisation at this frequency. >> I have to rather strenuously question that assertion, I'm afraid.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00318.html (8,157 bytes)

43. Re: LF: Re. Decca Mast (G3KEV) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 19:29:50 EDT
<< My point however is that the "small ant" at Puckeridge can only be described as a vertical with top loading,and that it will radiate as such and in no other way. >> How can it _not_ radiate some o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00319.html (8,952 bytes)

44. Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 14:53:09 EDT
Indeed there has been. Some of it has gotten rather silly and occasionally a bit abusive, in fact. I'm glad to see the discussion has been more civilized here, although there are still evident tende
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00030.html (15,235 bytes)

45. Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:02:18 EDT
R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00031.html (8,722 bytes)

46. Re: LF: Slow CW vs. BPSK etc. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:26:16 EDT
Rik posted while I was still struggling to finish typing mine. If he had been a bit faster or I had been a bit slower, I could have addressed some part of the bandwidth issue. <g> The necessary bandw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00033.html (10,290 bytes)

47. Re: LF: BPSK's, not all the same. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 15:45:54 EDT
The links on the LWCA "LF Ham and Digital" page (lwca.org/sitepage/lfham/lfham.htm), although not always as current as I'd like to maintain them, are a good place to start. There are two links in par
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00034.html (8,429 bytes)

48. Re: LF: Bessel bandpass filter? (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 01:26:07 EDT
Hi Bob, Bessel filters do have wonderful group delay characteristics, and a bandpass version is entirely mathematically realisable...but not especially useful. The skirts of such a filter are so gent
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00038.html (8,919 bytes)

49. LF: Copying Slow CW by Ear (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 00:27:44 EDT
Bill VE2IQ announced his new time-crunching software Thursday for recording QRS transmissions via the sigma-delta converter and playing them back at an accelerated rate through a regular PC sound car
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00113.html (7,920 bytes)

50. Re: LF: GRIMETON (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:20:56 EDT
Daniel F1TAY a *crit : Quel est l'adresse du sit web de la station musée SAQ (Grimeton Suéde) car apparemment le site serait inactif ? Le but est d'avoir la fréquence exacte et les >heures de la tran
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00213.html (8,039 bytes)

51. Re: LF: Petr's Easygram (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:41:16 EDT
I am trying to work out how to use a bandwidth of -10Hz, before he removes it from the menu! Actually, I suspect it would take a bandwidth closer to -30Hz to achieve that much output. But I'm having
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00232.html (8,557 bytes)

52. Re: LF: Petr's Easygram (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:17:31 EDT
<< Dividing by Zero is easy.... My Windows PC tries it all the time!! >> If it succeeds, please advise soonest. Will make generous offer. :)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-06/msg00234.html (7,925 bytes)

53. Re: LF: Big/small antennas. (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:56:07 EST
Walter is quite right, of course, that amateurs are not bound by the 24hr - 365 days/year service requirements imposed upon professional LF systems engineers. However, the examples he cites abundantl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00101.html (10,604 bytes)

54. Re: LF: Hamble School of Yachting.htm (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:45:44 EST
<< I am surprised that anyone had problems with Netscape. >> I'm not. As a webmaster who tries to keep our pages as widely readable as possible, I've been trying to write them in strict accord with H
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00187.html (9,275 bytes)

55. Re: LF: Re: Loops, Pre-amps and Imps (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 13:27:16 EST
<< Curiously an earth at the shack end has the opposite effect - so not all earths are the same! >> Good observation. You may want to see an article in the LWCA File Libraries section; specifically,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00298.html (8,606 bytes)

56. Re: LF: PSK sidebands (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:52:29 EST
If one is serious enough about civilized PSK sidebands to consider linear amplification-- which is no trivial matter at the "California kilowatt" levels being discussed here lately-- why not simply t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00312.html (9,663 bytes)

57. Re: LF: Fw: [Lowfer] New PC based 1750 Meter Transmitter (Product) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:35:33 EST
<< We would of course need much finer steps than 100Hz. >> It would help on this side of the pond, too, now that you mention it. The power line controller signals we have to contend with here tend to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00333.html (8,301 bytes)

58. Re: LF: keep cool (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:04:01 EST
<< Following up on myself that (the curie point) does not apply to air cored coils of course. I only read the original message after sending this comment. >> Thanks for the clarification, Nick. I fou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-12/msg00470.html (8,589 bytes)

59. Re: LF: RE: Final update on FM 19kHz pilot tones (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 20:17:59 EST
<< I can remember in the early days of TV here in the states that we would occasionally see such things -- when they were not synched. Now you just see a stable ghost of the 'interfering' station in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00123.html (9,464 bytes)

60. Re: LF: Re: Accuracy of Soundcards, programs, an d related stuff (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:32:47 EST
Fascinating explanation, Paul. I still have a Sony PCM adapter for recording on videotape, and had never made the connection with that particular sampling rate. 73, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00274.html (7,762 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu