Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 259 ]

Total 259 documents matching your query.

61. Re: VLF: tonite on the 36km band... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 22:32:59 +0200 (CEST)
The 20170504 transmission received in Warsaw: found rank 0 ber 3.2337e-01 Eb/N0 6.6 M -2.813181400e+00 [VLF] ps [ 0 0 0 0 0] carrier phase: 1.6 carrier Eb/N0: 6.9 carrier S/N: 19.23 dB in 34.0 uHz el
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00053.html (11,542 bytes)

62. Re: VLF: tonite on the 36km band... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:07:19 +0200 (CEST)
Decoded found rank 0 ber 3.9500e-01 Eb/N0 1.0 M -1.617533445e+00 [xxxx] ps [ 36 30 0 30 0] carrier phase: -0.7 carrier Eb/N0: 1.6 carrier S/N: 15.21 dB in 31.2 uHz elapsed 233 VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF ..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00057.html (11,559 bytes)

63. Re: VLF: tonite on the 36km band... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 10:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
btw this decodes even with list length=1 sq5bpf@dellix:~/vlf$ ./ebnaut -d -N4 -p 16K21A -S40 -k 6 -r240 -c2 -PS -v -L 1 < plikxx padded 0.267 seconds at end initial reference phase 46.9 amplitude 9.6
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00058.html (11,773 bytes)

64. Re: VLF: 6470... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 08:36:38 +0200 (CEST)
I think i've decoded the 06.May.2017   18:00:00 UTC 6470.1Hz transmission, but 2-bit crc passes multiple decodes, most probable message: found rank 1 ber 4.1912e-01 Eb/N0 -0.0 M -2.227154732e+00 [xx]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00071.html (12,455 bytes)

65. Re: VLF: today on the 46km band... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 19:07:12 +0200 (CEST)
Am 08.05.2017 08:29, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: i think i've decoded it, but 2-bit crc passes multiple decodes, most probably the message is R9: Sorry, both decodes are false. Did you correct the star
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00088.html (12,105 bytes)

66. Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 18:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
Decoded the 20170522 message on 8270.1Hz found rank 0 ber 3.4079e-01 Eb/N0 2.8 M -3.252938271e+00 [xxxxx xxxxxx] ps [ 0 0 0 0 0] carrier phase: 5.7 deg carrier Eb/N0: 2.2 dB carrier Es/N0: -11.31 dB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00202.html (14,090 bytes)

67. Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
Decoded the 20170523 8270.1Hz transmission in Warsaw KO02md: found rank 0 ber 3.3245e-01 Eb/N0 5.0 M -3.513146400e+00 [xxxx] ps [ 0 0 0 0 0] carrier phase: -3.2 deg carrier Eb/N0: 5.0 dB carrier Es/N
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00204.html (14,534 bytes)

68. Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 22:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
I've tried the decoded message in ebnaut signal analysis mode, the decoder returns: initial reference phase 45.0 amplitude 2.401e-03 carrier phase: 45.4 carrier Eb/N0: -7.1 carrier S/N: 22.50 dB in 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00215.html (14,768 bytes)

69. Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 00:56:05 +0200 (CEST)
Hmm maybe you can build a RX loop and build a software cardioid to get some gain?! 8.27 kHz could be enough far away from the mains QRM... my antenna is in the middle of Warsaw. i live in an old soci
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00218.html (14,169 bytes)

70. Re: ELF: ZEVS back on air (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 20:42:57 +0200 (CEST)
btw i've just had a 1.5 min signal at 75Hz, time is in UTC+2. probably local, but interesting anyway, i haven't seen anything similar. btw there's a faint 82Hz line there too. jacek It looks like ZEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00247.html (12,503 bytes)

71. Re: LF: 82 Hz signal (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:04:09 +0200 (CEST)
The 82Hz carrier is gone, yesterday when i looked at it there was a carrier on 88Hz , and today there is a carrier at 90.2Hz. Spectrograms here: https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2017/05/29/zevs-na-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00256.html (9,220 bytes)

72. Re: LF: 82 Hz signal (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:42:27 +0200 (CEST)
now the signal went from 90Hz to 92Hz at 8:05 UTC, and disappeared at 8:11 UTC. i've added the spectrogam showing the change at the bottom of the page: https://klubnl.pl/wpr/en/index.php/2017/05/29/z
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00257.html (10,354 bytes)

73. Re: LF: 82 Hz signal (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:51:07 +0200 (CEST)
I don't see these 90Hz and 92Hz signals here this morning, 06:00 to 08:30 UT. Nothing in the range 87.5 to 92.5 Hz. then most probably it's intermodulation or it could also be a local signal (althou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-05/msg00261.html (9,990 bytes)

74. Re: VLF: tomorrow morning... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:30:07 +0200 (CEST)
Most probably copied the message on 20170603 3:00. I've cheated a bit with the -f9 option. The decode was sent to Stefan for confirmation, the message is really at the limit, so you could also call t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00029.html (10,508 bytes)

75. Re: VLF: tomorrow morning... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 00:22:40 +0200 (CEST)
Hello, I'm posting the description of the decode, people which use the linux software will find it obvious, but maybe someone will find it interesting/helpful for his attemps. BTW I got Stefan's perm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00031.html (13,427 bytes)

76. Re: VLF: New EbNaut announcement... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 14:47:05 +0200 (CEST)
found rank 2 ber 4.0000e-01 Eb/N0 2.0 M -9.469240904e-01 [xx] ps [ 0 0 0 0 0] carrier phase: 3.9 deg carrier Eb/N0: -1.1 dB carrier Es/N0: -17.98 dB carrier S/N: 9.50 dB in 29.8 uHz, -35.76 dB in 1Hz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00054.html (11,001 bytes)

77. Re: VLF: New EbNaut announcement... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:01:39 +0200 (CEST)
Decoded the 20170607 message (message sent to Stefan for verification). btw this is not my longest message on 6470Hz, i've decoded the 7-character MARCONI message (normal decode published at the end
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00079.html (12,192 bytes)

78. Re: VLF: New EbNaut announcement... (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:15:39 +0200 (CEST)
Thanks for the transmission Stefan. although this is easy decode, it can be used to optimise the receiver for longer messages. I've tried to process this using different vtblank -a and -t parameters,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00094.html (12,416 bytes)

79. Re: LF: Neo6M vs Neo7M (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 22:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
Is there any improvement of the Neo-7M over the Neo-6M? [...] the neo-6m can generate up to 999Hz on the timepulse output. this is good for a 1pps timing source for vlfrx-tools (just shorten the tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00275.html (11,728 bytes)

80. Re: LF: Octo-soundcard for the Raspi, another question (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 19:18:13 +0200 (CEST)
I had to call the vlfrx tools from /usr/local/bin into that script, otherwise nothing happened. at the begining of the script insert: export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin you won't have to use the full p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-07/msg00047.html (11,704 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu