Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

41. LF: Re: Re Jason .WAV files (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:23:50 +0200
Hi Alan and other Rx stations, The audio frequency is unimportant, but please make note of the expected center frequency and sideband, as I don't have a good way to search for these signals. Unless t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00062.html (9,090 bytes)

42. Re: LF: Jason files wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:31:02 +0200
Hi Jim and Wolf, Many thanks for the offer. One more request -- if it's perfect copy, please reduce Tx power so that there are some errors :) Data from other Rx sites will also be greatly appreciated
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00067.html (9,366 bytes)

43. LF: Jason files wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:52:04 +0200
Hi all, I am looking at possible decoding algorithms for Jason or for future M-ary FSK systems. I'd very much like to test them on real world data. Does anyone have recordings of Jason signals that t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00081.html (8,145 bytes)

44. Re: LF: Phase meter for propagation experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:48:40 +0200
The typical Doppler at end-of-life of a GEO satellite is about 40 meters per second. That translates to about .02 Hz at 136 kHz. I don't know what can be expected at midlife, perhaps an order of magn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00112.html (11,540 bytes)

45. LF: Re: Re: Phase meter for propagation experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 01:35:30 +0200
Hi Wolf and all, The SNR of the LORAN lines in the receiver's passband makes it difficult to track them, and as I understand it I need two of them separated by a couple of Hertz to use them to calibr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00137.html (9,678 bytes)

46. LF: Re: Phase meter for propagation experiment (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:21:41 +0200
Hi Wolf and all, With some additional programming, it should be possible to eliminate most or all of the special hardware. That might let you get a number of folks to participate in reception. One po
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00141.html (14,511 bytes)

47. LF: Re: MC8309P (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 23:30:45 +0200
Hi Stewart, This is a Motorola TTL dual 4-input mux, originally from Fairchild. The 9300 series is same spec, except only 0 to 70 degree temp, probably adequate for your purpose, and much easier to f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-04/msg00152.html (9,640 bytes)

48. LF: Re: Limiter in Jason reception (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:32:43 -0700
Hi Johan and all, does your Jason decoder try to keep track of symbol timing or does it only wait looking for the next transition (as the native decoder)? It averages over the last 16 or so symbols (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00070.html (11,484 bytes)

49. LF: Re: Re: Limiter in Jason reception (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:26:28 -0700
Hi Jim and all, BTW, when watching the decoder in action, "G4JNT" first decoded correctly, then the decoder retrospectively blanked out the "G" - On the whole, I think it would be useful if the decod
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-08/msg00073.html (9,840 bytes)

50. Re: LF: sound cards...well amybe if..... (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:21:11 +0100
Hi Jim and all, I suspect that the aliasing problem may not be in the sound card, but rather in the driver's software sample rate conversion. Most recent Windows systems are set up to always run the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00003.html (11,898 bytes)

51. Re: LF: sound cards...well amybe if..... (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:57:17 +0100
Hi all, An S&H with 1 us sample time and 100 us hold time is very easy for today's parts. The state of the art is several orders of magnitude better for both parameters. Take a look at this A/D with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00026.html (12,346 bytes)

52. LF: Re: sound cards...well amybe if..... (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 01:38:03 +0100
Hi Alan and all, Virtually all modern sound cards do sigma-delta (sometimes called delta-sigma) A/D conversion. See http://www.rmsinst.com/dt3.htm for a good introduction and http://www.innovative-ds
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00031.html (11,386 bytes)

53. LF: Re: testing FETs (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:09:40 +0100
Hi Peter and all, Although a FET normally "blows" shorted, if the circuit that it is in permits a huge current to then flow, the internal bonding wire will act as a fuse and the final result is an op
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00065.html (8,781 bytes)

54. LF: Re: Please check .... (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 02:45:08 +0200
Hi Alan and all, Hi all, it would seem that though not being sent through the Reflector, some reflector member's PC has been infected and is sending out quanties of infected mail. The message mention
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-10/msg00273.html (11,751 bytes)

55. LF: Re: Calibrating LF Current Meters (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:41:23 +0100
Hi Hugh, You don't say what other instruments you have available, but here are a few suggestions: 1. Measure the RF voltage across the dummy load with a scope. Determine current by knowing or measuri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00174.html (11,816 bytes)

56. Re: LF: To Ponder over the weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:26:00 +0100
Hi Andy, Jim and all, This is a great question, because it tells a lot about the background of the person answering, even if the answer is "correct". The engineer will say that most of the "missing"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00313.html (11,816 bytes)

57. Re: Don't open "Re:LF:Capacity hat puzzle" from Rik Strobbe (bug bear virus again!) (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 20:27:49 +0100
Hi all, The infected message certainly has nothing to do with Rik -- the From: address is forged. Hugh is also correct about the fen-net.de origin. There are three things about a Bugbear message that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00442.html (11,190 bytes)

58. Re: LF: M0BMU Jason Success! (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:27:14 +0100
Hi Steve and all, I suspect that these propagation peaks that last two hours or more are accompanied by relatively stable phase delay. If so, coherent detection using a carrier recovered by e.g. an h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00212.html (11,206 bytes)

59. Re: LF: Re: QSO format (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:21:42 +0100
Hi Jim and all, Well, I admit to not having any solid data on the subject, and was hoping to get some feedback from the propagation experts here. The HBG signal would not be used to predict the absol
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00240.html (12,182 bytes)

60. Re: LF: Re: QSO format (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 19:48:04 +0100
Hi all, I believe that you have all the elements here to make a system that can work at "any" SNR, i.e. a QSO could be completed even when propagation is poor, it would just take longer. The basic id
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00283.html (11,802 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu