Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. LF: SAQ Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:37:10 +0100
Hi LF Group, Must have improoved the setup here, SAQ 45dB above noise, and also seeing the backwave 25dB above noise too. Interesting when they tuned back to 17.2kHz I noticed the signal gain 5dB by
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00129.html (9,562 bytes)

22. LF: SAQ Testing Now (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:24:31 +0100
17.2kHz Lee. M0LMH.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00169.html (9,572 bytes)

23. RE: LF: SAQ Testing Now (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:23:17 +0100
Seem to be back on again now 13:21utc Lee. M0LMH --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M0FMT Sent: 09 December 2009 13
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00229.html (11,700 bytes)

24. LF: SAQ in IO93gx (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:35:55 +0100
Hi Jay, LF Group, This was how the message sounded from here. http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/SAQ%2020091210%200800utc%20Message.MP3 Size 3.7Mb, Duration 16 minutes. 73, Lee M0LMH.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00622.html (9,489 bytes)

25. LF: RE: saq Christmas transmission (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:07:10 +0100
Hi Simon, LF Group Just put this recording on the web of the SAQ transmision. Not as good as the ones earlier in the month. http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/SAQ%2020091224%200800utc%20Message.MP3 73, Lee M0LMH
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00691.html (10,423 bytes)

26. LF: RE: 500 kHz WSJT JT4A (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:45:06 +0100
Hi Gary, 202800 24 -2 1.9 223 32 * TEST G4WGT IO 1 0 203000 25 -1 1.9 223 33 * TEST G4WGT IO 1 0 203200 22 -2 1.8 223 30 * TEST G4WGT IO 1 0 203400 24 -2 2.0 223 31 * TEST G4WGT IO 1 0 203600 23 -2 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00019.html (13,876 bytes)

27. RE: LF: Cat Whiskers (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:15:19 +0100
Hi John, Markers were every 15 seconds. Also the whole thing was repeated every 5kHz going up in frequency. If if you look carefully the tips of the whiskers are connected. My thought after reading L
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00064.html (11,632 bytes)

28. RE: LF: RE: Dirty carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:19:34 +0100
Hi Rik, Maybe I should have also noted that what I was receiving extended from 503.450 to 504.550. 73, Lee. Lee, the 504 carrier is there as long as I know. I guess that Mal's carrier is something di
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00244.html (10,397 bytes)

29. LF: WSPR LA3 (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:23:01 +0100
Hi Klaus, Yes I'm using V2 However: 100109 1456 9 -22 2.4 0.503919 LA3/O28WJJ 10 -3 13 0 100109 1500 7 -24 1.6 0.503921 LA3/O28WJJ 10 -1 1 0 100109 1502 6 -25 1.8 0.503919 <...> JO28WJ 10 0 3 0 10010
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00306.html (12,334 bytes)

30. LF: RE: Dirty carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:14:23 +0100
Hi Mal, I've got carriers spaced 117Hz, with feinter ones at 58.5Hz Do seem centred about 504.000 All are continuous and don't appear related to any amateur activity. Also a strong carrier on 505.000
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00401.html (12,557 bytes)

31. LF: WSPR LA3? (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:19:38 +0100
Receiving the following non-loggable spot around 503.915 Looks like the Call field is incorrect. LA3/O28WJJ <...> JO28WJ 73, Lee M0LMH.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00511.html (10,054 bytes)

32. LF: Re: WSPR LA3? (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:50:13 +0100
Cor, The issue is not one of RTFM. It's that the "Hotel Alpha Sierra Hotel" algorithm has failed, caused maybe by unusual user input. Lee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00520.html (8,575 bytes)

33. LF: WE2XGR/6 50% Reporting (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:22:25 +0100
Hi All, Seems WE2XGR/6 is coming in FB in the EU for those listening. Interesting oddity is that both compound call and locator transmissions are decoded fine by the software, but only transmissions
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00627.html (10,251 bytes)

34. LF: WD2XSH/29 (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:34:04 +0100
I have the grid and await the call. 02:20 503950 -31 <...> EN91QU 33 73, Lee M0LMH IO93gx.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00700.html (9,082 bytes)

35. LF: Cat Whiskers (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:41:20 +0100
Hi All, Anyone come across these? http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/grabs/CatWhiskers.jpg I have seen them on 80m too in the past. 73, Lee M0LMH.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-01/msg00783.html (10,470 bytes)

36. LF: RE: WSPR S/N Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:43:54 +0100
Hi Andy, Jim, LF Group, I did a similar test back in January and had similar results using a 20Hz bandwidth on WE2XGR/6 and managed 20dB or so improvement. The WSPR spectrogram showed nicely the ripp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00404.html (14,217 bytes)

37. LF: SAQ 12:00utc (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 00:47:27 +0100
Hi All, Missed most of the first SAQ transmission unfortunately. Recording of the second one can be found here without any processing. http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/SAQ%2020100704%201200utc%20Message.MP3 Si
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-07/msg00152.html (10,967 bytes)

38. LF: QRM 498-502 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:12:37 +0100
Hi All, 22:07 UTC Is everyone seeing the 4kHz wide COFDM signal centred on 500kHz currently about 20dB over the noise here. Appears on G3YXM's Grabber too. SM6BGP managing to appear over the top of i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00501.html (11,423 bytes)

39. RE: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:38:51 +0100
Hi John, Roelof, Graham, and all, Set up the grabber here so you can see the signal I refer. Notably it doesn't seem as strong as yesterday and with considerably more QSB. http://www.m0lmh.co.uk/grab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00505.html (11,485 bytes)

40. RE: LF: QRM 498-502 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:30:20 +0100
Hi John, LF, It's there now and I've just restarted the grabber. Only just over the noise here, but expect it to pick up later on. 73, Lee M0LMH. Hello Paul-Henrik! I can see no sign of the signal ye
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-10/msg00722.html (12,594 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu