To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: RE: WSPR S/N Tests |
From: | "Lee Hudson" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:10:52 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:Importance; b=ko0fKNWiDITXDcRizLU02tkw3Twy/QHGNedoxCVwcn6xCn5/M5vaE1vvuPofvfYjck9k0xjQHRT6EtaXbMpJSfn9sg/yw6osaUSDc30sr7z8Bh6qoqznPRBQ65LCcWE1kxvOKp669ORmZzJWA75jHYHW4OBGrEv0o7uSF3DkCf8= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcqoIoBlrM3slppiQB+z3Fen/bAmoQA0Co+g |
Hi
Andy, Jim, LF Group,
I did
a similar test back in January and had similar results using a 20Hz bandwidth on
WE2XGR/6 and managed 20dB or so improvement.
The
WSPR spectrogram showed nicely the ripples in the filter used, and appeared to
be a limiting factor as to how far you could go.
Also
WSPR spent more time trying to recover something from these ripples, in one case
nearly the full 2 mins.
Test
was triggered also by too good to be true signal reports from some stations, as
Andy has spotted.
Interestingly these stations would fail to report other stations that
should clearly be readable given the S/N ratios reported.
With
careful inspection of the reports it was sort of possible to get a feel for what
bandwidth was actually being monitored. But not conclusive enough to be sure. A
transmitting station that drifted through the WSPR band was very handy for
highlighting this.
Looking at the spread of S/N reports you would also find a sudden cut
off point way above -30dB norm were reports would not be given and this could be
an indicator of the gain achievable by over filtering that should tie in with
your findings.
Rather
than spend hours analysing logs, and contemplating how my station could be
improved further, it was much easier to discount these reports all together as
being unreliable and of no use.
73,
Lee
M0LMH.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Loran closure, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: RE: Loran closure, Dave G3WCB |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: WSPR S/N Tests, Clemens Clemens |
Next by Thread: | LF: G4JNT_beacon, Lubos OK2BVG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |