Mail Archive Search: <+from:hb9asb@gmail.com>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Re: qso (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:03:24 +0100; Hello Marcin Yes, we will try it again. If WX is good, I will be QRV Friday Evening, probably allready from 19:00 til 23:00 UTC. 73 de Toni 2009/11/30 Marcin <[email protected]> Hello Toni If you callin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00385.html (12,624 bytes)
22. LF: SM6BHZ strong in HB9 (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:13:22 +0100; The SM6BHZ Beacon on 600m is 579 here tonight. Not bad for 3W. Why WSPR when CW works fine? What a wonderfull band! 73 de Toni, HB9ASB; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00476.html (10,023 bytes)
23. Re: Re: LF: Re: qso (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:20:23 +0100; Hello Toni If you calling my I have QSO on DK8ND. I copied your twice transmiting CQ. Maybe have qso next friday? 73! Marcin Hello Marcin I've seen your signal in QRS10. It was quite strong. I called; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00571.html (14,396 bytes)
24. Re: FW: Re: LF: Re: qso (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:42:24 +0100; Hallo Toni, vielen Dank für den Sked. Ich bin mal gespannt. Wetter scheint ja mitzuspielen. Gruß, vy73 Marco, DD7PC From: Anton Bärtschi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 03 December 2009 16:20 To:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00633.html (15,678 bytes)
25. LF: Re: Unser QSO auf 137,7 (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:15:36 +0100; Hallo Toni, falls die Mail nicht durchgekommen war. Besten Dank für ein kurzes Lebenszeichen. vy 73 de Gerhard // DK6NI == Von: Beckmann, Gerhard [mailto:[email protected]]; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-12/msg00635.html (19,369 bytes)
26. Re: LF: Re: RE: CQ HE3OM MW Sottens 137,300 CW (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:07:40 +0100; Tony, any chance for 500kHz activity ? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Anton Bärtschi [[email protected]] Verzonden: za; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00193.html (16,023 bytes)
27. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:39:51 +0100; Thanks Claudio the mast is grounded via a choke. Unfortunately the inductivity is to low for 136kHz. So we have to change it. But we will be careful. 10kV is not for joking. 73 de Toni; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00202.html (11,575 bytes)
28. Re: LF: RE: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 07:47:06 +0100; Good morning LF Group and many thanks dear Rick, Alan and Jim for the very interesting answers. It's a pleasure to chat again with you. Yes, the ancient times will revive for a couple of nights! We w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00647.html (11,773 bytes)
29. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:48:37 +0100; Hi Mal Thank you for the response. So I will take my attenuator box to the site, connect the mast to the RX and see what happens. It will be difficult to get a receiving antenna far away enough, and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00658.html (11,985 bytes)
30. LF: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:06:00 +0100; Soon I may use a freestanding and isolated 125m mast with an excellent radial network for LF. Should I use a separate receiving antenna or try to receive also with the mast? 73 de Toni; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00673.html (10,107 bytes)
31. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:36:30 +0100; Hi Toni, Thanks about the weblink. Yes, 1 W ERP can be done with a QRP TX, supplied by a 9V block battery ;-) BTW i just remembered your call from some HF QSOs i think. Do you have a digital logbook; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00857.html (16,289 bytes)
32. Re: LF: Re: Separate Receiving Antenna? (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:57:31 +0100; Hi Tony, We haven't had QSO before but i am looking forward with interest to your LF activity and hope to be QRV as well. I am using a 100m or 300m vertical antenna and i am QRV in regularly CW. You; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00924.html (14,120 bytes)
33. Re: LF: RE: Re: Re: HE3OM (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:32:25 +0100; An hour ago I've sent this report to the LF group, but it did not appear on the reflector: Hello LF friends and many thanks for your patience, we are still in a learning process and testing phase. To; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00977.html (17,494 bytes)
34. Re: LF: Re: RE: CQ HE3OM MW Sottens 137,300 CW (score: 1): Author: Anton Bärtschi <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:57:33 +0100; He seems to have Vanished g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Dave G3WCB. To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01089.html (13,299 bytes)
35. Re: LF: RE: Re: Re: HE3OM (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:47:31 +0100; Hello Toni, if you want to use a big antenna as RX antenna sufficient attenuation between antenna and RX is essential. For the 125m tower it might be 40dB or more. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01129.html (19,289 bytes)
36. Re: LF: Re: HC51U Crystals (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:29:19 +0100; Alan G3NYK -- Original Message -- From: "Martin Mac Gregor" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 7:15 PM Subject: LF: HC51U Crystals; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00025.html (11,864 bytes)
37. Re: LF: TA tonite (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:22:19 +0100; Toni Signal was unstable but is settling down. Watching in QRSS10. http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] HB9ASB To: rsgb_lf_; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00035.html (14,458 bytes)
38. LF: HE3OM on 137.3 this weekend (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:04:11 +0100; Hello dear LF friends This weekend we will be on the air again with the 125m Tower of the old MF-Transmitter at Sottens JN36ip. The signal should be strong enough to be seen in QRSS3 in USA&Canada. I; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00048.html (9,024 bytes)
39. LF: HE3OM Next Operation on 137.3 kHz (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:46:11 +0100; Hello all Friday I will be at HE3OM again. I will arrive around 12:00 UT to heat up the shack and do some tests. From 14:00 UT to 22:00 UT I will be at the station. Modes: CW, Crossmode CW/QRSS, Cros; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00052.html (10,223 bytes)
40. Re: LF: TA HE3OM (score: 1): Author: HB9ASB <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:44:19 +0100; Well done Toni last nite with your TA qso. You had a lovely strong signal in the USA also visible in Haifa. I went QRT and watched the QSO and did not TX again. I normally close down around 0130 ut; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-02/msg00078.html (10,831 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]