Dave, I assume the signal I was seeing on 922.75 that disappeared when G3KEV went QRT was yours. Sure looked odd on this end that both signals ceased and the loran line faded at the same time. http:/
Starting before sunset here in NC Mal's signal was strong for several hours. See this screen shot: http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/KEV29Dec01.jpg At about 0015 UTC Mal's signal stopped. Perhaps he went QRT.
Mal was good copy here tonight. http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/G3KEV27Dec01.jpg Here is his RRR to VE1ZJ. Also someone had a good test signal on 135.9215 just before 0000 hrs. http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/G3KE
Thanks for the aleart Markus! I thought I was seeing odd noise bursts but it was Jim's signal I think. I had the top part of the signal above my screen. I have reset the screen to catch it all but no
I think I saw a few dots around 2330. I have a loran line very close to 921 so no dashes seen. Dex I had Laurie briefly around 2300 -- unfortunately, I had left Argo set for 20 second dots, so it's a
Laurie's signal is detectable here in NC tonight. I arrived home several hours after dark so I got a late start. Noise is running about 5 db above the level I noted when Laurie's signal was Q5. A fas
Nothing at all seen here so far. Will continue to run overnight. Dex Laurie disappeared over an hour ago, and there was no convincing sign of Peter by that time, so I'll assume that the ionosphere ha
Thanks to the W1TAG propagation alert machine I was able for the first time to receive Q5 copy of Laurie's signal on 72.401 kHz. Laurie's signal was last seen about 0630 UTC. Argo capture can be seen
The ZL6QH signal was received again in North Carolina last night. Best signal occurred shortly before local sunrise this time. First trace of signal was see shortly after sunset ZL time. Best recepti
I was beginning to see Jim's signal around 0045 UTC here in NC. Shortly thereafter the band noised up as darkness moved west. There was a line of thunderstorms a few hundred miles west of my location
Hi All, I'm pretty tired so will give the beacon a miss tonight. 73s Laurie. Laurie, I see activity on your frequency just about every night you transmit. Since you are not transmitting tonight I wil
Laurie, I watched your frequency for the past two nights. Last night I once again captured activity on your frequency but caught nothing positive. The night before, while W1TAG was receiving good cop
Noise in North Carolina was slightly higher than the night before. The 73.6 RTTY pounded away all night. I don't know if this very strong signal so close to 72.4 khz is hurting my reception or not. L
I have uploaded two more screen shots from last night if anyone would like to analyze the times of reception. http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHb1Dec01.jpg http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHc1Dec01.jpg If I
I was surprised to clearly see both signals in your recording. Assuming that your receiver was set to 71750 USB, you can see CFH peaks at 73563 and 73638. Also Rugby peaks at 73200 and 73300, about 3
http://www.qsl.net/w4dex/ZL6QHa1Dec01.jpg Looks like .4 Hz DFCW to me. Time on Argo is EST (-5 UTC). I calibrated for 0 Hz on Argo scale to represent 137.790 kHz when I set up about 0400 UTC. I just
If you mean 50 dB above the noise in CW bandwidth or wider, wow! HBG's power is "only" 20 kW, see http://www.metas.ch/en/labors/official-time/hgb/tech_d.html , so a 200 mW signal would be 50 dB weake
John, The 75 Hz RTTY centered on 73.6 kHz is not a continuous transmission. I have heard it every day this week around 2200 UT. It produces a reading of -30 dbm on my selective level meter (tuned loo