Good SAQ reception also from Italy JN45SL See here for a screenshot of the waterfall http://www.sdradio.eu/images/SAQ_12-6-2008_12-04-57PM.gif 73 Alberto I2PHD --
Hi all, dj8wx is xmitting at 135,975kHz in WSPR mode, pwr abt 50mWERP. RX dial 134,475kHz (USB). No traces of your signal, but another one showed up, about 80 Hz lower... 2240 -21 1.8 0.135896 -1 TM0
mal hamilton wrote: Andy and the Digi Boys Would it be possible to move to 1.9 mhz and upwards and leave 137 and 500 khz to the discerning CW radio amateurs de mal/g3kev Please don't listen to Mal. I
Hello Alberto, maybe a bad message. *F4DTL Nicolas* Shouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the past some rows received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)... but maybe it catche
This is what has been copied so far, starting at about 22:00 UTC 2232 -27 2.1 0.137570 0 DF6NM JN59 17 2244 -27 2.1 0.137570 0 DF6NM JN59 17 2252 -19 2.1 0.137570 0 DF6NM JN59 23 2300 -17 2.2 0.13757
There you go guys. You may as well stop your 600m experiments right now as Mal has proclaimed that there is "nothing new to discover". Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could all see the future as clear
Just started WSPR again, and see a nice bright trace at approx 503.965 in the 20:40 slot, but again no decode. I see no-one else reported a successful decode on WSPRnet at that time either. Looks lik
Just received. Were it not for the fact that I don't like to leave the PC switched on when I am away, I am sure I could continue to receive Jim's transmission all night long 090109 0054 6 -23 1.2 0.5
Not bad reception of SAQ transmission this morning in JN08WN (my job) Not QSB and not QRN,thanx to Lars and the Grimeton's team. *F4DTL /P Nicolas* There has been an SAQ transmission this morning ? I
They take several 10s of seconds to reach usable brightness....longer than tuble starters. No good for short spells of activity as they are only becomming usable when they are switched off. Hmmm, ma