Hi Uwe, If you can decode other stations, you must of course decode yourselfe as well. If not, there is either a time- or frequency shift. You will see it in the WSPR-waterfall. As a test, disconnect
Am 18.02.2015 22:07, schrieb [email protected]: Traces were seen from time to time on the G4WGT and G3YXM grabbers, though not on the DK7FC MF grabber. Is this one in your Garden Stefan? Not yet Joe. It
I agree with Clemens (exceptionally ;-) ). You should be decoded by someone in a range below 200 km. Try in daytime! The groundwave SNR could be better than at night, at least for distances arround 1
Chris, I can see your carrier on 136.174 kHz, drifting downwards abt 1 Hz per 30 minutes :-) Looks interesting :-) What is the VFO and PA? 73, Stefan Am 24.02.2015 15:52, schrieb C. Groeger: QRV on 1
Hello Jay and Mike, Thanks for the nice LF TA reports despite difficult condx. 73, Stefan Am 24.02.2015 22:27, schrieb DK7FC: Hi LF, Time to put out some kWh. I'll be on air on 136.172 in DFCW-90 unt
Hello Martin, Sorry to hear that. I hope there was no human loss? As i know you, you will find a solution for any problem :-) 73, all the best Stefan Am 25.02.2015 05:00, schrieb [email protected]: Hi
Hi VLF, Ohohooo, i can see a signal on 8270 Hz in 47 uHz. Maybe Uwe is doing a new digital test? http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html 73, Stefan
Hi all, A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber /spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal. Would you (all) still vote for that size? Since > 5 years
Hi Markus, I've just checked it with my smartphone which also has a resolution of 1024x600. There is a large grabber window on http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_remote_Grabber.html
PS: I admit, the screen becomes a bit flat then, like Loriot's superscope! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5zXRaLvAY 73, Stefan Am 28.02.2015 13:41, schrieb DK7FC: Hi Markus, I've just checked it w
Hi all, Yesterday i wrote an answer regarding the mail problem of RW3ADB. It was adressed to the reflector and to Roman directly in CC. The mail didn't come through. So maybe it is a Spam-Filter prob
Hi Martin, That looks nice! Good to see that your station is running again. Sorry for my limited time in the last time, i have a lot to do, with amateur radio stuff!! :-) Actually it is a good time i
Hi Fausto, It goes up and down, the activity... I'm spending a LOT of time for my Raspberry programming, with good progress. Thus i'm not so much QRV since 2 weeks. Hope that the others will hold the
Hi Bob, Joe, all, I also got some good traces of your XEB signal here in JN49IK, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/TA60_09.MAR_05.57UTC.jpg Of course Joe's big signal was there too
Hi Joe, Yes, actually we should try it again. And i think we can try QRSS-3. It should be no problem. Maybe i'll come back to you this evening. 73, Stefan Am 10.03.2015 01:54, schrieb [email protected]:
Hello Tobias, LF, Recently my smartphone reminded me on an entry i made last year. We discussed about the new WSQ mode and if it will be established as a permanent used QSO data mode. It was also the
Hi Rik, Interesting statistic. Well, when looking to the WSPR map you can see that you (and me) are quite in the center of activity. If you can work a station in CW you probably prefer that against Q
Hi Hugh, Right now there is someone transmitting OP32 on LF. I would assume you could detect him. Just give it a try :-) 73, Stefan Am 13.03.2015 21:31, schrieb Markus Vester: Hi Hugh, maybe there